Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35503379›Full record

Trial reportEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2022

In patients with well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumours, there is no apparent benefit of somatostatin analogues after disease control by peptide receptor radionuclide therapy.

Aleksandra Syguła, Aleksandra Ledwon, Kornelia Hasse-Lazar, Beata Jurecka-Lubieniecka, Barbara Michalik, Ewa Paliczka-Cieślik, Marcin Zeman, Ewa Chmielik, Joanna Sczasny, Barbara Jarzab and 1 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Cost-Effectiveness of [Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aleksandra SygułaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland.
Aleksandra LedwonDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland.
Kornelia Hasse-LazarDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland.
Beata Jurecka-LubienieckaDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland.
Barbara MichalikDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland.
Ewa Paliczka-CieślikDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland.
Marcin ZemanThe Oncologic and Reconstructive Surgery Clinic, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Ewa ChmielikTumor Pathology Department, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Joanna SczasnyRadiology and Diagnostic Imaging Department, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Barbara JarzabDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland.
Daria Handkiewicz-JunakDepartment of Nuclear Medicine and Endocrine Oncology, Gliwice Branch, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Wybrzeże Armii Krajowej 16, 44-101, Gliwice, Poland. daria.handkiewicz-junak@io.gliwice.pl.ORCID 0000-0003-0802-2880
The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposePeptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and somatostatin analogues (SSAs) are commonly combined as primary treatment for neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), and SSAs given as maintenance. We sought to evaluate whether sequential therapy with PRRT followed by SSAs has progression or survival benefits in patients with NEN after disease control by PRRT.

methodsThis prospective, randomised, single-centre study had as principal eligibility criteria: unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic, histologically confirmed well-differentiated NEN; no symptoms/biochemical diagnosis of carcinoid syndrome; no SSAs or ≤ 3 months of SSAs before PRRT; and stable disease or partial or complete response after PRRT. Altogether, 115 patients were randomised 2:1 to an SSA group (n = 74) given octreotide acetate LAR every 4 weeks, or a control group (n = 41) receiving only best supportive care. Octreotide treatment was to stop upon intolerable toxicity or patient refusal, or, at physician/patient discretion, upon NEN progression. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), the secondary endpoint, and overall survival (OS).

resultsMedian (25th-75th percentile) follow-up from the first PRRT activity to death or latest observation was 6.6 (3.18-10.22) years. During that time, 71/115 patients (62%) progressed, 52/74 (70%) in the SSA group, and 19/41 (46%) in the control group (p = 0.01). Eighty-eight/115 patients (76%) died, 58/74 (78%) in the SSA group, and 30/41 (73%) in the control group (p = 0.52). Median (95% CI) PFS was 4.7 (2.8-7.7) years in the SSA group, and 6.4 (4.1-not reached) years in controls. Overall, median OS was 6.6 years. Neither PFS nor OS differed between groups (p = 0.129, p = 0.985, respectively).

conclusionsIn patients with disease control after PRRT, subsequent SSA treatment appeared not to be associated with better PFS or OS. Whether to continue SSA administration upon progression after PRRT requires evaluation in a prospective, randomised, controlled multicentre study with a relatively homogeneous sample.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsSomatostatinHumansOctreotideProspective StudiesRadioisotopesReceptors, SomatostatinRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeOctreotideRadioisotopesReceptors, SomatostatinSomatostatinNeuroendocrine malignanciesPeptide receptor radionuclide therapySequential treatmentSomatostatin analoguesSurvival

Identifiers

PMID35503379
OpenAlexW4225404442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.