Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35503346›Full record

Trial reportJAMA2022

Effect of Self-monitoring of Blood Pressure on Diagnosis of Hypertension During Higher-Risk Pregnancy: The BUMP 1 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Katherine L Tucker, Sam Mort, Ly-Mee Yu, Helen Campbell, Oliver Rivero-Arias, Hannah M Wilson, Julie Allen, Rebecca Band, Alison Chisholm, Carole Crawford and 19 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT03334149 (Blood Pressure Monitoring in High Risk Pregnancy to Improve the Detection and Monitoring of Hypertension), which is not on this map. Cited by 51 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
51citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03334149 nacompletednot on this map

Blood Pressure Monitoring in High Risk Pregnancy to Improve the Detection and Monitoring of Hypertension

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of OxfordRan2017 to 2020Enrolled3,042ConditionsPregnancy, High Risk, Pre-Eclampsia, Hypertension, Hypertension, Pregnancy-InducedArmsSelf-Monitoring of Blood Pressure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

51 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Remote and self-monitoring for pregnant women at risk of gestational hypertensive disorders: a cost-effectiveness analysis.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. The FemTech revolution: Unlocking the potential of new technology for optimizing pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries and remote areas.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Comparison of the associations between office and home BP with placenta-mediated pregnancy complications: the BOSHI study.Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine L TuckerNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Sam MortNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Ly-Mee YuNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Helen CampbellNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Oliver Rivero-AriasNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Hannah M WilsonDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Julie AllenNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Rebecca BandDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Alison ChisholmNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Carole CrawfordNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Greig DougallNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Lazarina EngonidouNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Marloes FranssenNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Marcus GreenAction on Pre-eclampsia, The Stables, Evesham, Worcestershire, United Kingdom.
Sheila GreenfieldInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Lisa HintonNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
James HodgkinsonInstitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom.
Layla LavalleeNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Paul LeesonCardiovascular Clinical Research Facility, RDM Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Christine McCourtCentre for Maternal and Child Health Research, City, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Lucy MackillopNuffield Department of Women's and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Jane SandallDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Mauro SantosInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Lionel TarassenkoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Carmelo VelardoInstitute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Lucy YardleyDepartment of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Lucy C ChappellDepartment of Women and Children's Health, King's College London, St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Richard J McManusNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
BUMP Investigators
University of Oxford · GBSt Thomas' Hospital · GBUniversity of Birmingham · GBCity, University of London · GBThe Stables · GBUniversity of Bristol · GBUniversity of Cambridge · GBUniversity of Southampton · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Inadequate management of elevated blood pressure (BP) is a significant contributing factor to maternal deaths. Self-monitoring of BP in the general population has been shown to improve the diagnosis and management of hypertension; however, little is known about its use in pregnancy. Objective: To determine whether self-monitoring of BP in higher-risk pregnancies leads to earlier detection of pregnancy hypertension. Design, Setting, and Participants: Unblinded, randomized clinical trial that included 2441 pregnant individuals at higher risk of preeclampsia and recruited at a mean of 20 weeks' gestation from 15 hospital maternity units in England between November 2018 and October 2019. Final follow-up was completed in April 2020. Interventions: Participating individuals were randomized to either BP self-monitoring with telemonitoring (n = 1223) plus usual care or usual antenatal care alone (n = 1218) without access to telemonitored BP. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time to first recorded hypertension measured by a health care professional. Results: Among 2441 participants who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 33 [5.6] years; mean gestation, 20 [1.6] weeks), 2346 (96%) completed the trial. The time from randomization to clinic recording of hypertension was not significantly different between individuals in the self-monitoring group (mean [SD], 104.3 [32.6] days) vs in the usual care group (mean [SD], 106.2 [32.0] days) (mean difference, -1.6 days [95% CI, -8.1 to 4.9]; P = .64). Eighteen serious adverse events were reported during the trial with none judged as related to the intervention (12 [1%] in the self-monitoring group vs 6 [0.5%] in the usual care group). Conclusions and Relevance: Among pregnant individuals at higher risk of preeclampsia, blood pressure self-monitoring with telemonitoring, compared with usual care, did not lead to significantly earlier clinic-based detection of hypertension. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03334149.

Indexed as

Blood Pressure Monitoring, AmbulatoryHypertensionAdultBlood PressureFemaleHumansHypertension, Pregnancy-InducedPre-EclampsiaPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskSelf-TestingTelemetry

Identifiers

PMID35503346
PMCPMC9066279
OpenAlexW4225311176

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.