Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35503325›Full record

ArticlePediatrics2022

Building a Life Course Intervention Research Framework.

Shirley A Russ, Emily Hotez, Mary Berghaus, Clarissa Hoover, Sarah Verbiest, Edward L Schor, Neal Halfon

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Design of an Early Year's Intervention With and for the Community: A Needs Assessment and Gap Analysis.Health promotion journal of Australia : official journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Prevalent Adverse Childhood Experiences Among Young Adults Returning Home From Jail: The Need for Trauma-Informed Reentry Services.Journal of correctional health care : the official journal of the National Commission on Correctional Health Care · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Shirley A RussCenter for Healthier Children, Families, and Communities, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Emily HotezCenter for Healthier Children, Families, and Communities, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Mary BerghausCenter for Healthier Children, Families, and Communities, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
Clarissa HooverFamily Voices, Lexington, Massachusetts.
Sarah VerbiestSchool of Social Work, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Edward L Schor
Neal HalfonCenter for Healthier Children, Families, and Communities, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California.
University of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo report on first steps toward building a Life Course Intervention Research Framework (LCIRF) to guide researchers studying interventions to improve lifelong health.

methodsThe Life Course Intervention Research Network, a collaborative national network of >75 researchers, service providers, community representatives and thought leaders, participated in an iterative review process. Building on the revised Medical Research Council Guidance for Developing and Evaluating Complex Interventions, they identified 12 additional key models with features for inclusion in the LCIRF, then incorporated the 12 characteristics identified by the Life Course Intervention Research Network as actionable features of Life Course Interventions to produce the new LCIRF.

resultsThe LCIRF sets out a detailed step-wise approach to intervention development: (1) conceptualization and planning, (2) design, (3) implementation, (4) evaluation, and (5) spreading and scaling of interventions. Each step is infused with life course intervention characteristics including a focus on (1) collaborative codesign (2) health optimization, (3) supporting emerging health development capabilities (4) strategic timing, (5) multilevel approaches, and (6) health equity. Key features include a detailed transdisciplinary knowledge synthesis to inform intervention development; formation of strong partnerships with family, community, and youth representatives in intervention codesign; a means of testing the impact of each intervention on biobehavioral processes underlying emerging health trajectories; and close attention to intervention context.

conclusionsThis first iteration of the LCIRF has been largely expert driven. Next steps will involve widespread partner engagement in framework refinement and further development. Implementation will require changes to the way intervention studies are organized and funded.

Indexed as

Life Change EventsResearch DesignAdolescentHumans

Identifiers

PMID35503325
PMCPMC9847427
OpenAlexW4225281126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.