ReviewPediatrics2022
A Framework for Cross-Sector Partnerships to Address Childhood Adversity and Improve Life Course Health.
Review in Pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effect of a Social Care Intervention on Health Care Experiences of Caregivers of Hospitalized Children: A Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA pediatrics · 2023Trial
- Developmental outcomes across foster care, adoption, and child welfare services: a mini review.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Review
- Y2CONNECT Baltimore: A Mobile-Friendly Locally Based Solution to Connect Adolescents and Young Adults to Resources Across Sectors.Health promotion practice · 2025Article
- Article
- Seeking Optimal, Integrated Pediatric Medical and Social Care: A Qualitative, Peer Researcher-Driven Study.Academic pediatrics · 2025Article
- Article
- The impact of adverse childhood experiences on depression in old age: evidence from China.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Addressing Mental Health and Social Needs in Tandem to Promote Health Equity.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2024Review
- A Road Map for Population Health and Health Equity Research.JAMA pediatrics · 2024Article
- Research with and Inclusive of Children in Immigrant Families: A Narrative Review of Methods and Approaches.Academic pediatrics · 2024Review
- Multisector Collaboration vs. Social Democracy for Addressing Social Determinants of Health.The Milbank quarterly · 2024Article
- Pursuing a Cross-Sector Approach to Advance Child Health Equity.Pediatric clinics of North America · 2023Review
- Innovations in social health delivery to advance equitable pediatric and adolescent life course health development: A review and roadmap forward.Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care · 2023Review
- Innovations in social health delivery to advance equitable pediatric and adolescent life course health development: A review and roadmap forward.Current problems in pediatric and adolescent health care · 2023Review
- Caregiving Across the Life Course: A Health Policy Priority for North Carolina.North Carolina medical journal · 2023Article
- A Data-Driven Approach to Optimizing Medical-Legal Partnership Performance and Joint Advocacy.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023Article
- Implementation of cross-sector partnerships: a description of implementation factors related to addressing social determinants to reduce racial disparities in adverse birth outcomes.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- National Prevalence of Social Determinants of Health Screening Among US Neonatal Care Units.Hospital pediatrics · 2022Article
- What Makes an Intervention a Life Course Intervention?Pediatrics · 2022Article
- The Emergence of Life Course Intervention Research: Optimizing Health Development and Child Well-Being.Pediatrics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Childhood adversity and its structural causes drive lifelong and intergenerational inequities in health and well-being. Health care systems increasingly understand the influence of childhood adversity on health outcomes but cannot treat these deep and complex issues alone. Cross-sector partnerships, which integrate health care, food support, legal, housing, and financial services among others, are becoming increasingly recognized as effective approaches address health inequities. What principles should guide the design of cross-sector partnerships that address childhood adversity and promote Life Course Health Development (LCHD)? The complex effects of childhood adversity on health development are explained by LCHD concepts, which serve as the foundation for a cross-sector partnership that optimizes lifelong health. We review the evolution of cross-sector partnerships in health care to inform the development of an LCHD-informed partnership framework geared to address childhood adversity and LCHD. This framework outlines guiding principles to direct partnerships toward life course-oriented action: (1) proactive, developmental, and longitudinal investment; (2) integration and codesign of care networks; (3) collective, community and systemic impact; and (4) equity in praxis and outcomes. Additionally, the framework articulates foundational structures necessary for implementation: (1) a shared cross-sector theory of change; (2) relational structures enabling shared leadership, trust, and learning; (3) linked data and communication platforms; and (4) alternative funding models for shared savings and prospective investment. The LCHD-informed cross-sector partnership framework presented here can be a guide for the design and implementation of cross-sector partnerships that effectively address childhood adversity and advance health equity through individual-, family-, community-, and system-level intervention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.