Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35503247›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical Internet research2022

Ethical Issues in Social Media Recruitment for Clinical Studies: Ethical Analysis and Framework.

Bettina M Zimmermann, Theresa Willem, Carl Justus Bredthauer, Alena Buyx

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical Internet research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. "Infantgram?" recruitment of infants to a clinical sleep study via social media.Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society · 2024
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bettina M Zimmermann *Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7047-4496
Theresa Willem *Institute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7643-8816
Carl Justus BredthauerInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5490-8431
Alena BuyxInstitute of History and Ethics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5726-7633

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media recruitment for clinical studies holds the promise of being a cost-effective way of attracting traditionally marginalized populations and promoting patient engagement with researchers and a particular study. However, using social media for recruiting clinical study participants also poses a range of ethical issues.

objectiveThis study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the ethical benefits and risks to be considered for social media recruitment in clinical studies and develop practical recommendations on how to implement these considerations.

methodsOn the basis of established principles of clinical ethics and research ethics, we reviewed the conceptual and empirical literature for ethical benefits and challenges related to social media recruitment. From these, we derived a conceptual framework to evaluate the eligibility of social media use for recruitment for a specific clinical study.

resultsWe identified three eligibility criteria for social media recruitment for clinical studies: information and consent, risks for target groups, and recruitment effectiveness. These criteria can be used to evaluate the implementation of a social media recruitment strategy at its planning stage. We have discussed the practical implications of these criteria for researchers.

conclusionsThe ethical challenges related to social media recruitment are context sensitive. Therefore, social media recruitment should be planned rigorously, taking into account the target group, the appropriateness of social media as a recruitment channel, and the resources available to execute the strategy.

Indexed as

Social MediaEthical AnalysisEthics, ResearchHumansResearch Personnelclinical studiesclinical trialsethicsrecruitmentsocial media

Identifiers

PMID35503247
PMCPMC9115665

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.