Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35503188›Full record

ReviewPlanta2022

Biopriming for induction of disease resistance against pathogens in rice.

Shasmita, Barsha Bhushan Swain, Pradipta Kumar Mohapatra, Soumendra Kumar Naik, Arup Kumar Mukherjee

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Planta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Antagonistic activity of twoFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Characterization of aFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

ShasmitaMolecular Plant Pathology Laboratory, Division of Crop Protection, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India.
Barsha Bhushan SwainDepartment of Botany, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha, 753003, India.
Pradipta Kumar MohapatraDepartment of Botany, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha, 753003, India.
Soumendra Kumar NaikDepartment of Botany, Ravenshaw University, Cuttack, Odisha, 753003, India.
Arup Kumar MukherjeeMolecular Plant Pathology Laboratory, Division of Crop Protection, ICAR-National Rice Research Institute, Cuttack, Odisha, 753006, India. Ak.Mukherjee@icar.gov.in.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6451-0358
Ravenshaw University · INCentral Rice Research Institute · IN

Funding

Science and Engineering Research Board IF150009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionRice is attacked by an armada of pathogens. Present review provides a critical evaluation of the potential of different biotic agents used to protect rice yield drop from pathogenicity and an account of unexplored areas, which might be taken into consideration to manage rice diseases. Rice (Oryza sativa L.), is the most important staple food of Asian countries. Rice production is significantly limited by a diversity of pathogens, leading to yield loss and deficit in current rice supply. Application of agrochemicals of diverse types has been considered as the only option to control pathogens and enhance rice production, thereby causing environmental concerns and making the pathogens resistant to the active ingredients. Increase in population and resistance of pathogen towards agrochemicals put pressure on the agronomists to search for safe, novel, eco-friendly alternative ways to manage rice pathogens. Inducing resistance in rice by using different biotic/abiotic agents provides an environmental friendly alternative way to effectively manage bacterial, fungal, and viral rice pathogens. In recent years, a number of protocols have been developed for inducing pathogen resistance by bio-priming of rice. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the potential of different biotic agents to protect rice crop loss from pathogens is hitherto lacking due to which the research on induction of defense against pathogens in rice is discontinuous. This review deals with the detailed analysis of the bacterial and fungal agents used to induce defense against rice pathogens, their mode of application, mechanism (physiological, biochemical, and molecular) of defense induction, and effect of defense induction on the yield of rice. It also provides an account of gaps in the research and the unexplored areas, which might be taken into consideration to effectively manage rice pathogens.

Indexed as

OryzaAgrochemicalsAsiaDisease ResistancePlant DiseasesAgrochemicalsAntioxidant enzymesBiotic agentsChlorophyll a fluorescenceInduced systemic resistancePathogen resistanceRiceSystemic acquired resistance

Identifiers

PMID35503188
OpenAlexW4225320145

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.