Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35503117›Full record

ArticlePediatric cardiology2022

The Surprise Question as a Trigger for Primary Palliative Care Interventions for Children with Advanced Heart Disease.

Faraz Alizadeh, Emily Morell, Kevin Hummel, Yunhong Wu, David Wypij, Danes Matthew, Paul Esteso, Katie Moynihan, Elizabeth D Blume

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric cardiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Faraz AlizadehDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA. Faraz.Alizadeh@cardio.chboston.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9452-4566
Emily MorellDivision of Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Kevin HummelDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Yunhong WuDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
David WypijDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8367-8711
Danes MatthewDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Paul EstesoDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Katie MoynihanDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2515-2951
Elizabeth D BlumeDepartment of Cardiology, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.
Boston Children's Hospital · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is significant uncertainty in describing prognosis and a lack of reliable entry criteria for palliative care studies in children with advanced heart disease (AHD). This study evaluates the utility of the surprise question-"Would you be surprised if this child died within the next year?"-to predict one-year mortality in children with AHD and assess its utility as entry criteria for future trials. This is a prospective cohort study of physicians and nurses caring for children (1 month-19 years) with AHD hospitalized ≥ 7 days. AHD was defined as single ventricle physiology, pulmonary vein stenosis or pulmonary hypertension, or any cardiac diagnosis with signs of advanced disease. Primary physicians were asked the surprise question and medical record review was performed. Forty-nine physicians responded to the surprise question for 152 patients. Physicians responded "No, I would not be surprised if this patient died" for 54 (36%) patients, 20 (37%) of whom died within 1 year, predicting one-year mortality with 77% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 37% positive predictive value, and 94% negative predictive value. Patients who received a "No" response had an increased 1-year risk of death (hazard ratio 7.25, p < 0.001). Physician years of experience, subspecialty, and self-rated competency were not associated with the accuracy of the surprise question. The surprise question offers promise as a bedside screening tool to identify children with AHD at high risk for mortality and help physicians identify patients who may benefit from palliative care and advance care planning discussions.

Indexed as

Heart DiseasesPhysiciansChildHumansPalliative CarePrognosisProspective StudiesAdvanced care planningAdvanced heart diseasePediatric cardiologyPediatric palliative carePrognosticationSurprise question

Identifiers

PMID35503117
OpenAlexW4225327502

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.