Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35502763›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2022

Investigating the use of machine learning to generate ventilation images from CT scans.

James Grover, Hilary L Byrne, Yu Sun, John Kipritidis, Paul Keall

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James GroverACRF Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Hilary L ByrneACRF Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Yu SunSchool of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
John KipritidisACRF Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Paul KeallACRF Image X Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Funding

Australian Government (NHMRC) Investigator GrantCancer Institute NSW Translational Program Grant
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRadiotherapy treatment planning incorporating ventilation imaging can reduce the incidence of radiation-induced lung injury. The gold-standard of ventilation imaging, using nuclear medicine, has limitations with respect to availability and cost. PURPOSE: An alternative type of ventilation imaging to nuclear medicine uses 4DCT (or breath-hold CT [BHCT] pair) with deformable image registration (DIR) and a ventilation metric to produce a CT ventilation image (CTVI). The purpose of this study is to investigate the application of machine learning as an alternative to DIR-based methods when producing CTVIs.

methodsA patient dataset of 15 inhale and exhale BHCTs and Galligas PET ventilation images were used to train and test a 2D U-Net style convolutional neural network. The neural network established relationships between axial input BHCT image pairs and axial labeled Galligas PET images and was evaluated using eightfold cross-validation. Once trained, the neural network could produce a CTVI from an input BHCT image pair. The CTVIs produced by the neural network were qualitatively assessed visually and quantitatively compared to a Galligas PET ventilation image using a Spearman correlation and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). The DSC measured the spatial overlap between three segmented equal lung volumes by ventilation (high, medium, and low functioning lung [LFL]).

resultsThe mean Spearman correlation between the CTVIs and the Galligas PET ventilation images was 0.58 ± 0.14. The mean DSC over high, medium, and LFL between the CTVIs and Galligas PET ventilation images was 0.55 ± 0.06. Visually, a systematic overprediction of ventilation within the lung was observed in the CTVIs with respect to the Galligas PET ventilation images, with jagged regions of ventilation in the sagittal and coronal planes.

conclusionsA convolutional neural network was developed that could produce a CTVI from a BHCT image pair, which was then compared with a Galligas PET ventilation image. The performance of this machine learning method was comparable to previous benchmark studies investigating a DIR-based CTVI, warranting future development, and investigation of applying machine learning to a CTVI.

Indexed as

Four-Dimensional Computed TomographyLung NeoplasmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLungMachine LearningPulmonary Ventilationfunctional lung imagingGalligas PETmachine learningventilation

Identifiers

PMID35502763
PMCPMC9545612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.