Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35502617›Full record

ArticleTransboundary and emerging diseases2022

Metatranscriptomic profiling reveals diverse tick-borne bacteria, protozoans and viruses in ticks and wildlife from Australia.

Alexander W Gofton, Kim R Blasdell, Casey Taylor, Peter B Banks, Michelle Michie, Emilie Roy-Dufresne, Jacqueline Poldy, Jian Wang, Michael Dunn, Mary Tachedjian and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transboundary and emerging diseases, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Global epidemiology of tick-borneFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Tick-borne piroplasms and trypanosomes incidentally detected in eastern grey kangaroos (International journal for parasitology. Parasites and wildlife · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Alexander W GoftonCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Canberra, Connecticut, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5039-6117
Kim R BlasdellCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Casey TaylorSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Peter B BanksSchool of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Michelle MichieCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Canberra, Connecticut, Australia.
Emilie Roy-DufresneCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Canberra, Connecticut, Australia.
Jacqueline PoldyCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Canberra, Connecticut, Australia.
Jian WangCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Canberra, Connecticut, Australia.
Michael DunnCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Mary TachedjianCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Australian Centre for Disease Preparedness, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
Ina SmithCSIRO, Health and Biosecurity, Canberra, Connecticut, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tick-borne zoonoses are emerging globally due to changes in climate and land use. While the zoonotic threats associated with ticks are well studied elsewhere, in Australia, the diversity of potentially zoonotic agents carried by ticks and their significance to human and animal health is not sufficiently understood. To this end, we used untargeted metatranscriptomics to audit the prokaryotic, eukaryotic and viral biomes of questing ticks and wildlife blood samples from two urban and rural sites in New South Wales, Australia. Ixodes holocyclus and Haemaphysalis bancrofti were the main tick species collected, and blood samples from Rattus rattus, Rattus fuscipes, Perameles nasuta and Trichosurus vulpecula were also collected and screened for tick-borne microorganisms using metatranscriptomics followed by conventional targeted PCR to identify important microbial taxa to the species level. Our analyses identified 32 unique tick-borne taxa, including 10 novel putative species. Overall, a wide range of tick-borne microorganisms were found in questing ticks including haemoprotozoa such as Babesia, Theileria, Hepatozoon and Trypanosoma spp., bacteria such as Borrelia, Rickettsia, Ehrlichia, Neoehrlichia and Anaplasma spp., and numerous viral taxa including Reoviridiae (including two coltiviruses) and a novel Flaviviridae-like jingmenvirus. Of note, a novel hard tick-borne relapsing fever Borrelia sp. was identified in questing H. bancrofti ticks which is closely related to, but distinct from, cervid-associated Borrelia spp. found throughout Asia. Notably, all tick-borne microorganisms were phylogenetically unique compared to their relatives found outside Australia, and no foreign tick-borne human pathogens such as Borrelia burgdorferi s.l. or Babesia microti were found. This work adds to the growing literature demonstrating that Australian ticks harbour a unique and endemic microbial fauna, including potentially zoonotic agents which should be further studied to determine their relative risk to human and animal health.

Indexed as

BorreliaIxodesRickettsiaTick-Borne DiseasesTick InfestationsVirusesAnimalsAnimals, WildAustraliaHumansBorreliametagenomicsmetatranscriptomicstick-borne pathogenstickszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID35502617
PMCPMC9790515

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.