ArticleTherapeutics and clinical risk management2022
Treatment and Outcome of Castleman Disease: A Retrospective Report of 31 Patients.
Article in Therapeutics and clinical risk management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Exploring castleman disease in a cohort of hispanic patients: a recognition to its histopathology.Journal of hematopathology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Castleman disease (CD) is a rare and heterogeneous lymphoproliferative disorder with a spectrum of characteristic pathological abnormalities of lymph node. Furthermore, its clinical diagnosis is very challenging until pathological results are available. This study aimed to investigate the clinical presentations, treatment and prognosis of CD, thereby improving the understanding and diagnosis of CD. Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 31 patients with CD admitted to the First Hospital Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University January 2013 to December 2020. The chi-square test and the Mann-Whitney rank sum test were employed to calculate between-group differences for categorical and quantitative data, respectively. Results: Clinically, patients with unicentric CD (UCD) usually present with lymphadenopathy. However, the clinical presentation of patients with multicentric CD (MCD) ranged from mild lymphadenopathy with B-symptoms (5/8, 62.5%) to intense inflammation, vascular leak syndrome (3/8, 37.5%), hepatosplenomegaly (3/8, 37.5%), organ insufficiency (3/8, 37.5%), and even death (2/8, 25.0%). Compared with UCD patients, patients with MCD had significantly lower levels of hemoglobin (104 (90,129) vs 137 (120,149), p=0.018) and plasma albumin (31.5 (27.0,37.0) vs 45.0 (40.0,46.5), p=0.001), but IgG levels were significantly increased. Patients with UCD were mainly treated with surgical resection alone, with a five-year survival rate of 95.65%. When siltuximab is not an option, steroid plus rituximab-based chemotherapy and specific supportive care are common options for MCD. Except for 2 deaths, the remaining MCD patients have stable disease or partial remission. Conclusion: CD describes a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by morphologically benign lymphoid hyperplasia. Notably, patients with MCD present varying degrees of inflammation responses, even involving multiple systems. Surgery is a direct and effective way to diagnose and treat UCD. In the absence of IL-6 antagonists, anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive therapeutic strategies, and cytotoxic clearance of cells responsible for hypercytokinemia could be adopted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.