ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Unstable plaques hide in heavily calcified coronary arteries.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Research on ischemic stroke risk assessment based on CTA radiomics and machine learning.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Charting the Unseen: How Non-Invasive Imaging Could Redefine Cardiovascular Prevention.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2024Review
- First in-human quantitative plaque characterization with ultra-high resolution coronary photon-counting CT angiography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The napkin-ring sign (NRS) was accepted as unstable plaques at coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA). However, the incidence is relatively low. We sought to assess whether the newly defined diamond-attenuation-sign [DAS, defined as a qualitative plaque feature in a mixed plaque (MP) on CCTA cross-section images by the presence of two features: a visual calcification (in the shape of a diamond) accompanied by an annular-shape lower attenuation plaque tissue surrounding the lumen like a ring], could be accurately identified as unstable atherosclerotic plaques. Methods: Eight heart transplant recipients (8 male; mean age, 48.5±11.6 years; range, 37-65 years) underwent CCTA exams prior to heart transplant surgery. Segment-based CCTA sections were independently evaluated for various plaque patterns including non-calcified plaque (NCP) with NRS (NCP-NRS), NCP without NRS (NCP-non-NRS), MP with DAS (MP-DAS), MP without DAS sign (MP-non-DAS), and calcified plaque (CP). Results: NCP-NRS plaques in 6.4% (23/358), NCP-non-NRS plaques in 24.0% (86/358), MP-DAS plaques in 18.2% (65/358), MP-non-DAS plaques in 20.1% (72/358), and calcified-plaques in 7.0% (25/358) of all cases. The specificity and positive predictive values of the MP-DAS and NCP-NRS signs to identify unstable plaque features were excellent (97.1% Conclusions: Both the DAS and NRS had a high specificity and positive predictive value for the presence of unstable lesions. DAS was a better identification of unstable atherosclerotic plaques in the assessment of plaque-calcification-pattern (PCP).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.