ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022
Evaluation of liver tumor identification rate of volumetric-interpolated breath-hold images using the compressed sensing method and qualitative evaluation of tumor contrast effect via visual evaluation.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pulsation artifact reduction using compressed sensitivity encoding in Gd-EOB-DTPA contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging.Radiological physics and technology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the possible clinical use of the compressed sensing-volumetric-interpolated breath-hold examination (CS-VIBE) in patients with liver tumors by evaluating tumor contrast enhancement effect by radiologists. Methods: We examined 22 patients with pathologically confirmed neoplastic lesions in the liver and 62 patients with lesions confirmed by imaging and clinical observation. To evaluate image quality, dynamic contrast-enhanced multiphase breath-hold magnetic resonance imaging was performed. The contrast agent used in this study was gadolinium-ethoxybenzyl-diethylenetriamine penta-acetic acid. Image quality was assessed by three radiologists experienced in this field. Using a four-point scale, we evaluated the gradual contrast enhancement effect of the portal vein to determine whether a decent arterial phase could be obtained. We assessed interobserver agreement using the Fleiss kappa to evaluate image quality between readers. The detection and evaluation of the tumor itself by its enhancement effects are very important in contrast studies. Thus, we evaluated the contrast enhancement effect of the tumors on a three-point scale in 26 patients already known to have hypervascularized tumors using ultrasound or computed tomography as assessed by experienced radiologists. Results: In terms of contrast enhancement effects of the portal vein, the mean value of the readers was 1.85 in the first phase, 2.07 in the second phase, 2.66 in the third phase, 3.05 in the fourth phase, and 3.24 in the fifth phase. Moreover, the interreader agreement was moderate (kappa 0.400-0.502) for all evaluated scores. In the signal of the portal vein, the score of the second arterial phase increased gradually, and in the third arterial phase, the mean score varied from 2 to 3. Compared with ultrasound or computed tomography, CS-VIBE identified 92.3% tumors with hypervascularized tumors (24 of 26 patients with findings hypervascularized tumors). In the results, the interreader agreement was fair to moderate (kappa 0.414-0.521). Conclusions: We obtained multiphase images, including at least one phase, which are useful for the evaluation of liver tumors. Furthermore, the radiologist was able to detect the tumor as before. Therefore, compressed sensing-volumetric-interpolated breath-hold examination is clinically useful in Ethoxybenzyl liver studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.