Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35502370›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2022

The influence of a deep learning image reconstruction algorithm on the image quality and auto-analysis of pulmonary nodules at ultra-low dose chest CT: a phantom study.

Yue Yao, Baobin Guo, Jianying Li, Quanxin Yang, Xiaohui Li, Lei Deng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Yue YaoDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Baobin GuoDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Jianying LiGE Healthcare, Beijing, China.
Quanxin YangDepartment of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Xiaohui Li *Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Lei Deng *Department of Radiology, the Second Affiliated Hospital, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: To investigate the effect of a new deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) algorithm on the detection, characterization and image quality of pulmonary nodules (PNs) in ultra-low dose chest computed tomography (CT) in comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR-V) algorithm. Methods: Nine artificial pulmonary nodules [six ground glass nodules (GGNs) and three solid nodules (SNs); density: -800 HU, -630 HU, 100 HU; diameter: 12 mm, 10 mm, 8 mm] were randomly placed in a thorax anthropomorphic phantom (Lungman, Kyoto Kagaku Inc.) and scanned on a 256-row CT (Revolution CT, GE Healthcare). Eight scans were performed at 70 kVp with different tube currents (20, 30, 50, 70, 90, 100, 120, 150 mA). Raw data were reconstructed using the filtered back projection (FBP), ASIR-V (30%, 50%, 80%) and DLIR (Low, Medium, High; TrueFidelity™) at 0.625 mm thickness. The effective radiation dose was recorded. All images were automatically analyzed using a commercially available artificial intelligence software (Intelligent 4D Imaging System for Chest CT 5.5, YITU Healthcare) and CT value, standard deviation (SD), long and short diameters of each nodule and SD of air (background) were measured. The detection rate, deformation degree (long diameter/short diameter), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of pulmonary nodules were calculated. Results: Nodule CT values were the same in all mA settings for all three types of reconstruction algorithms (all P>0.05). DLIR groups had significantly lower SD and higher SNR and CNR values, with better overall image quality than ASIR-V and FBP groups at each mA, ranging from 65-85% reduction in SD, 67-83% increase in SNR with DLIR-H over 50%ASIR-V and 75-91% reduction in SD and 77-89% increase in SNR with DLIR-H over FBP (all P<0.05). At ultra-low dose conditions (30 mA), the DLIR-H images had the highest detection rate of PNs (100%). In addition, the DLIR-M had a minimal negative effect on the characterization of PNs. Conclusions: DLIR algorithm can be a potential reconstruction technique to optimize image quality and improve detection rate of PNs in ultra-low dose lung screening.

Indexed as

Computed tomography (CT)deep learningimage reconstructionpulmonary nodule (PN)

Identifiers

PMID35502370
PMCPMC9014152

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.