Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35502313›Full record

ArticlePersonality and individual differences2021

Intergenerational conflicts of interest and prosocial behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Shuxian Jin, Daniel Balliet, Angelo Romano, Giuliana Spadaro, Caspar J van Lissa, Maximilian Agostini, Jocelyn J Bélanger, Ben Gützkow, Jannis Kreienkamp, PsyCorona Collaboration and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Personality and individual differences, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Intergenerational contact during and beyond COVID-19.The Journal of social issues · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. The Life with Corona survey.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shuxian JinVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Daniel BallietVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Angelo RomanoLeiden University, PO Box 9500, 2300 RA Leiden, the Netherlands.
Giuliana SpadaroVrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1105, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Caspar J van LissaUtrecht University, PO Box 80125, 3508 TC Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Maximilian AgostiniUniversity of Groningen, PO Box 72, 9700 AB Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jocelyn J BélangerNew York University Abu Dhabi, PO Box 129188, Saadiyat Island, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Ben GützkowUniversity of Groningen, PO Box 72, 9700 AB Groningen, the Netherlands.
Jannis KreienkampUniversity of Groningen, PO Box 72, 9700 AB Groningen, the Netherlands.
PsyCorona Collaboration
N Pontus LeanderUniversity of Groningen, PO Box 72, 9700 AB Groningen, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic presents threats, such as severe disease and economic hardship, to people of different ages. These threats can also be experienced asymmetrically across age groups, which could lead to generational differences in behavioral responses to reduce the spread of the disease. We report a survey conducted across 56 societies (

Indexed as

AgeCOVID-19Cross-culturalProsocial behaviorSocial dilemma

Identifiers

PMID35502313
PMCPMC9045808

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.