ReviewWorld journal of nuclear medicine2022
Comparison of
Review in World journal of nuclear medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Cartilage-SpecificBiomedicines · 2025Article
- Radiopharmaceuticals and their applications in medicine.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2025Review
- Bone scintigraphy based on deep learning model and modified growth optimizer.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Role of bone scintigraphy (bone scan) in skeletal osteosarcoma: A retrospective audit and review from tertiary oncology centre.Journal of orthopaedics · 2024Article
- Tumor Burden of Iodine-Avid Bone Metastatic Thyroid Cancer Identified viaJournal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Comparison of the diagnostic value of 18F-NaF PET/CT andTranslational cancer research · 2023Review
- The Role of PET/CT in Breast Cancer.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Skeletal standardized uptake values obtained using quantitative SPECT/CT for the detection of bone metastases in patients with lung adenocarcinoma.Frontiers in medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bone is a common metastasis site in several malignancies, most importantly prostate and breast cancers. Given the significance of the early and accurate diagnosis of bone metastases for preliminary staging, treatment planning and monitoring, restaging, and survival prediction in patients with malignancy, it is critical to compare and contrast the strengths and weaknesses of imaging modalities. Although technetium-99m-labeled diphosphonates [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.