Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35502223›Full record

ReviewCurrent stem cell reports2022

Impact of Cryopreservation and Freeze-Thawing on Therapeutic Properties of Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells and Other Common Cellular Therapeutics.

Chasen Cottle, Amanda Paige Porter, Ariel Lipat, Caitlin Turner-Lyles, Jimmy Nguyen, Guido Moll, Raghavan Chinnadurai

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current stem cell reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 77 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
77citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
20.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

77 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 140 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Microfluidic Platforms for Cryopreservation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

17 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Chasen CottleDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA USA.
Amanda Paige PorterDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA USA.
Ariel LipatDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA USA.
Caitlin Turner-LylesDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA USA.
Jimmy NguyenDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA USA.
Guido MollBIH Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT) and Berlin Brandenburg School of Regenerative Therapies (BSRT), Berlin Institute of Health (BIH), Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität zu Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6173-5957
Raghavan ChinnaduraiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1877-8975
Mercer University · USHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin · DE

Funding

Cytokine primed autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells for therapy of colitis.R01DK109508 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI GALIPEAU, JACQUES · 2016 to 2019
$2.1M
NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK109508
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose of Review: Cryopreservation and its associated freezing and thawing procedures-short "freeze-thawing"-are among the final steps in economically viable manufacturing and clinical application of diverse cellular therapeutics. Translation from preclinical proof-of-concept studies to larger clinical trials has indicated that these processes may potentially present an Achilles heel to optimal cell product safety and particularly efficacy in clinical trials and routine use. Recent Findings: We review the current state of the literature on how cryopreservation of cellular therapies has evolved and how the application of this technique to different cell types is interlinked with their ability to engraft and function upon transfer in vivo, in particular for hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs), their progeny, and therapeutic cell products derived thereof. We also discuss pros and cons how this may differ for non-hematopoietic mesenchymal stromal/stem cell (MSC) therapeutics. We present different avenues that may be crucial for cell therapy optimization, both, for hematopoietic (e.g., effector, regulatory, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified T and NK cell based products) and for non-hematopoietic products, such as MSCs and induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs), to achieve optimal viability, recovery, effective cell dose, and functionality of the cryorecovered cells. Summary: Targeted research into optimizing the cryopreservation and freeze-thawing routines and the adjunct manufacturing process design may provide crucial advantages to increase both the safety and efficacy of cellular therapeutics in clinical use and to enable effective market deployment strategies to become economically viable and sustainable medicines.

Indexed as

Cellular therapeuticsCryopreservationEffector T cells (Teff)Freeze-thawingFunctionalityInduced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs)Mesenchymal Stromal/Stem Cells (MSCs)Natural killer (NK) cellsRegulatory T cells (Treg)Safety and efficacyStem cells (MSCs)

Identifiers

PMID35502223
PMCPMC9045030
OpenAlexW4225405173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.