ArticlePublic health in practice (Oxford, England)2022
Running an active gaming-based randomized controlled trial during the COVID-19 pandemic: Challenges, solutions and lessons learned.
Article in Public health in practice (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of narratives and active video games among black and hispanic children with overweight and obesity: a randomized controlled trial.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2025Trial
- How much did it cost to develop and implement an eHealth intervention for a minority children population that overlapped with the COVID-19 pandemic?Contemporary clinical trials · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic has created significant obstacles for clinical trials and human subject research. This paper discusses the challenges our study team encountered while implementing an eHealth intervention during the pandemic, including: increased dropout, cancellation and rescheduling rates, increased mailing returns and delays, social distancing impediments, COVID-19 positive team members, and restricted training access. Study design: This is a short paper on research protocol for a six-month randomized controlled single-blind trial. Methods: N/A. Results: In response to these challenges, we changed the study protocol. We included multimodal communication models, amplified recruitment efforts, expanded our population's age range, increasingly utilized tracking labels, utilized external space for extra participants, and transitioned to a virtual RA training format. Conclusions: Sharing our experience and the adaptations required to run a clinical trial during the pandemic should provide useful and practical knowledge for institutions, funding agencies, and researchers. We believe that the lessons learned here would be applicable to future clinical trial research after the pandemic as well.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.