Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35502137›Full record

Observational studyUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2022

Blood-brain barrier leakage years after pre-eclampsia: dynamic contrast-enhanced 7-Tesla MRI study.

L P W Canjels, J F A Jansen, R J Alers, C Ghossein-Doha, M van den Kerkhof, V M M M Schiffer, E Mulder, S C Gerretsen, A P Aldenkamp, P P M Hurks and 3 more

Open access · greenAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

L P W CanjelsDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-4880-2670
J F A JansenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
R J AlersDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
C Ghossein-DohaGROW, School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M van den KerkhofDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
V M M M SchifferDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1873-0821
E MulderDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-2689-8528
S C GerretsenDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
A P AldenkampMHeNs, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
P P M HurksDepartment of Neuropsychology and Psychopharmacology, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
V van de VenDepartment of Cognitive Neuroscience, Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
M E A SpaandermanDepartment of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Maastricht University Medical Center (MUMC+), Maastricht, The Netherlands.
W H BackesDepartment of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Maastricht University Medical Centre · NLMaastricht University · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePre-eclampsia is a hypertensive complication of pregnancy that is associated with an increased risk of long-term cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disorders. Although the underlying mechanism of persistent susceptibility to cerebral complications after pre-eclampsia remains largely unclear, impaired blood-brain barrier (BBB) integrity has been suggested to precede several cerebrovascular diseases. In this study, we aimed to investigate the integrity of the BBB years after pre-eclampsia.

methodsThis was an observational study of premenopausal formerly pre-eclamptic women and controls with a history of normotensive pregnancy who underwent cerebral magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at ultra-high field (7 Tesla) to assess the integrity of the BBB. Permeability of the BBB was determined by assessing leakage rate and fractional leakage volume of the contrast agent gadobutrol using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI. BBB leakage measures were determined for the whole brain and lobar white and gray matter. Multivariable analyses were performed, and odds ratios were calculated to compare women with and those without a history of pre-eclampsia, adjusting for potential confounding effects of age, hypertension status at MRI and Fazekas score.

resultsTwenty-two formerly pre-eclamptic women (mean age, 37.8 ± 5.4 years) and 13 control women with a history of normotensive pregnancy (mean age, 40.8 ± 5.5 years) were included in the study. The time since the index pregnancy was 6.6 ± 3.2 years in the pre-eclamptic group and 9.0 ± 3.7 years in controls. The leakage rate and fractional leakage volume were significantly higher in formerly pre-eclamptic women than in controls in the global white (P = 0.001) and gray (P = 0.02) matter. Regionally, the frontal (P = 0.04) and parietal (P = 0.009) cortical gray matter, and the frontal (P = 0.001), temporal (P < 0.05) and occipital (P = 0.007) white matter showed higher leakage rates in formerly pre-eclamptic women. The odds of a high leakage rate after pre-eclampsia were generally higher in white-matter regions than in gray-matter regions.

conclusionThis observational study demonstrates global impairment of the BBB years after a pre-eclamptic pregnancy, which could be an early marker of long-term cerebrovascular disorders. © 2022 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Indexed as

HypertensionPre-EclampsiaAdultBlood-Brain BarrierContrast MediaFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedPregnancyContrast Media7 Teslablood-brain barriercerebrovascular disorderdynamic contrast-enhanced MRIpre-eclampsia

Identifiers

PMID35502137
PMCPMC9826493
OpenAlexW4225302278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.