Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35502064›Full record

ArticleIndian journal of ophthalmology2022

Vision centre helps reduce blindness and vision impairment. Proof of concept in a four-year longitudinal study in an urban area in India.

Parikshit M Gogate, Supriya P Phadke, Taraprasad Das, Shrivallabh Sane, Soumya Moosa, Ashok Dhangar, Minhaj Inamdar, Rajiv Khandekar, Renu Magdum, Jitendra S Bhawalkar and 1 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Indian journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Primary eye care - Key to universal eye health.Indian journal of ophthalmology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Parikshit M GogateCommunity Eye Care Foundation, Dr. Gogate's Eye Clinic; Department of Ophthalmology, D. Y. Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India; School of Health Sciences, Queen's University, Belfast, UK.
Supriya P PhadkeCommunity Eye Care Foundation, Dr. Gogate's Eye Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Taraprasad DasSrimati Kanuri Santhamma Cetre for Vitreoretinal Disease, L. V. Prasad Eye Institute, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Shrivallabh SaneMaharashtra Institute of Mental Health, B. J. Medical College and Sassoon General Hospitals, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Soumya MoosaOperation Eyesight Universal, PGR ICARE Campus, Kismatpur, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Ashok DhangarCommunity Eye Care Foundation, Dr. Gogate's Eye Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Minhaj InamdarCommunity Eye Care Foundation, Dr. Gogate's Eye Clinic, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Rajiv KhandekarResearch department, King Khalid Eye Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Renu MagdumDepartment of Ophthalmology, D. Y. Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Jitendra S BhawalkarDean, D. Y. Patil Medical College, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Kashinath BhoosnurmathOperation Eyesight Universal, PGR ICARE Campus, Kismatpur, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
Community Eye Care Foundation · INDr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre · INInstitute of Mental Health · INKing Khaled Eye Specialist Hospital · SAL V Prasad Eye Institute · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: To estimate the prevalence of blindness and severe visual impairment (SVI) by using a door-to-door screening and vision center (VC) examination strategy in an urban area in western Maharashtra (Pune), India and repeat the exercise after 4 years to study its impact. Methods: Four trained community health workers measured the visual acuity and performed an external ocular examination in patients' homes. People with vision <6/18 were requested to visit the VC for a comprehensive eye examination by an optometrist. An ophthalmologist examined people whose vision did not improve to 6/12. A home examination was done for people who did not visit the VC despite two requests. The same population was examined twice in an interval of 4 years. Results: In the study, 44,535 people in 2015-16 and 98.14% (n = 43,708) of them in 2018-19 were examined. Blindness (vision < 3/60 in better eye), and moderate-to-severe visual impairment (MSVI, vision 6/18-6/60 in better eye) were 0.26% and 1.3%, respectively, in the first cohort, and 0.16% and 1.1%, respectively, in the second cohort (P < 0.001). When the worse eye was considered, the prevalence of blindness reduced from 0.72% to 0.44%, SVI reduced from 0.1% to 0.07%, and MVI decreased from 1.7% to 1.49% between 2015 and 2019 (P < 0.001). Females (P < 0.001) and older individuals (P < 0.001) were more likely to have blindness or SVI. In the VC, 8211 people were examined in 4 years. Conclusion: The reduction of blindness and MSVI in the urban area of Pune can be partly ascribed to the presence of a VC and attendant screening in this locality.

Indexed as

BlindnessVision DisordersFemaleHumansIndiaLongitudinal StudiesVisual AcuityblindnessCataractIndiavision centrevisual impairment

Identifiers

PMID35502064
PMCPMC9332945
OpenAlexW4225378024

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.