ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2022
Maternal and fetal serum concentrations of magnesium after administration of a 6-g bolus dose of magnesium sulfate (MgSO
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- A follow up on the feasibility after national implementation of magnesium sulfate for neuroprotection prior to preterm birth.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2023Article
- Maternal and fetal serum concentrations of magnesium after administration of a 6-g bolus dose of magnesium sulfate (MgSOActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionMagnesium sulfate is used world-wide to treat pregnant women at imminent risk of preterm delivery in order to protect the brain of the premature infant. Previous research has shown that magnesium sulfate decreases the risk of cerebral palsy by ~30% in infants born preterm. Despite this, the dosage required for optimal neuroprotection remains unknown. We aimed to investigate whether 6 g magnesium sulfate given as a single bolus dose was tolerable for the women and infants and whether the desired target concentration in the mother's blood was reached and non-toxic level in the infant could be ensured. MATERIAL AND
methodsIn total, 49 women who were at risk of delivery prior to 32 weeks of gestation were recruited. They received a bolus dose of 6 g magnesium sulfate intravenously between 1 and 24 h prior to giving birth and were closely monitored during and after infusion. Blood samples from the patients were analyzed at different time-points (20-30 min after start of infusion, 1, 2, 6 and 24 h) post-administration. Blood samples from the umbilical cord were also taken directly after birth to assess the concentration of magnesium in the infant.
resultsNone of the women who received magnesium sulfate reached serum magnesium concentrations >3.3 mmol/L. In all, 72% of the women showed serum magnesium levels within the therapeutic interval (2.0-3.5 mmol/L) and no adverse events were observed during the infusion. The serum magnesium levels in the mothers declined to pre-bolus-levels within 24 h after delivery. Serum magnesium levels in the umbilical cord samples ranged from 0.87 to 1.4 mmol/L, which means that all but two were within the normal expected range for a newborn premature infant.
conclusionsA bolus dose of 6 g magnesium sulfate was well tolerated and without any serious side effects in either mother or infant. Most of our women reached the targeted concentration range of serum magnesium levels after infusion was completed. Their infants had magnesium levels within acceptable levels, regardless of gestational week or mother's body mass index.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.