Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501923›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2022

Fecal microbiota transfer between young and aged mice reverses hallmarks of the aging gut, eye, and brain.

Aimée Parker, Stefano Romano, Rebecca Ansorge, Asmaa Aboelnour, Gwenaelle Le Gall, George M Savva, Matthew G Pontifex, Andrea Telatin, David Baker, Emily Jones and 5 more

Abstract readVideo-Audio Media
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 233 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
233citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

233 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Intestinal-Bone Axis Mediated byMicroorganisms · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. DietaryFood science & nutrition · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Association between probiotic prescriptions and the incidence of primary open-angle glaucoma in patients with documented dry eye.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2026
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. The Critical Period Microbiota Shape Brain Plasticity.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article

173 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Aimée ParkerGut Microbes and Health Research Programme, Quadram Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK. aimee.parker@quadram.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-1765-9656
Stefano RomanoGut Microbes and Health Research Programme, Quadram Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Rebecca AnsorgeGut Microbes and Health Research Programme, Quadram Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Asmaa AboelnourInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, EC1V 9EL, UK.
Gwenaelle Le GallNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
George M SavvaGut Microbes and Health Research Programme, Quadram Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Matthew G PontifexNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Andrea TelatinGut Microbes and Health Research Programme, Quadram Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
David BakerGut Microbes and Health Research Programme, Quadram Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Emily JonesGut Microbes and Health Research Programme, Quadram Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
David VauzourNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, NR4 7TJ, UK.
Steven RudderGut Microbes and Health Research Programme, Quadram Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
L Ashley BlackshawGut Microbes and Health Research Programme, Quadram Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK.
Glen JefferyInstitute of Ophthalmology, University College London, London, EC1V 9EL, UK.
Simon R CardingGut Microbes and Health Research Programme, Quadram Institute, Norwich, NR4 7UQ, UK. simon.carding@quadram.ac.uk.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/CCG1860/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/N000250/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R012490/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR10353Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR10355Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/F/000PR10356
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAltered intestinal microbiota composition in later life is associated with inflammaging, declining tissue function, and increased susceptibility to age-associated chronic diseases, including neurodegenerative dementias. Here, we tested the hypothesis that manipulating the intestinal microbiota influences the development of major comorbidities associated with aging and, in particular, inflammation affecting the brain and retina.

methodsUsing fecal microbiota transplantation, we exchanged the intestinal microbiota of young (3 months), old (18 months), and aged (24 months) mice. Whole metagenomic shotgun sequencing and metabolomics were used to develop a custom analysis workflow, to analyze the changes in gut microbiota composition and metabolic potential. Effects of age and microbiota transfer on the gut barrier, retina, and brain were assessed using protein assays, immunohistology, and behavioral testing.

resultsWe show that microbiota composition profiles and key species enriched in young or aged mice are successfully transferred by FMT between young and aged mice and that FMT modulates resulting metabolic pathway profiles. The transfer of aged donor microbiota into young mice accelerates age-associated central nervous system (CNS) inflammation, retinal inflammation, and cytokine signaling and promotes loss of key functional protein in the eye, effects which are coincident with increased intestinal barrier permeability. Conversely, these detrimental effects can be reversed by the transfer of young donor microbiota.

conclusionsThese findings demonstrate that the aging gut microbiota drives detrimental changes in the gut-brain and gut-retina axes suggesting that microbial modulation may be of therapeutic benefit in preventing inflammation-related tissue decline in later life. Video abstract.

Indexed as

Fecal Microbiota TransplantationGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAgingAnimalsBrainInflammationMiceAgingFecal microbiota transplantationGut–brain axisGut–retinaInflammagingIntestineLeaky gutMicrobiota

Identifiers

PMID35501923
PMCPMC9063061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.