Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501879›Full record

Observational studyJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2022

Activity, socket fit, comfort and community participation in lower limb prosthesis users: a Cambodian cohort study.

Laura Diment, RaksmeyMutta Nguon, Sovansereyrathna Seng, Vannsnavy Sit, Ply Lors, Phearsa Thor, Samedy Srors, Sisary Kheng, Malcolm Granat, Maggie Donovan-Hall and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Methods to assess lower limb prosthetic adaptation: a systematic review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Replication of clinical prosthetic sockets for research purposes.Prosthetics and orthotics international · 2024
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Laura DimentUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
RaksmeyMutta NguonDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sovansereyrathna SengDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Vannsnavy SitDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Ply LorsDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Phearsa ThorDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Samedy SrorsDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Sisary KhengDepartment of Prosthetics and Orthotics, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Malcolm GranatUniversity of Salford, Salford, UK.
Maggie Donovan-HallUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Peter WorsleyUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Alex DickinsonUniversity of Southampton, Southampton, UK. alex.dickinson@soton.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0002-9647-1944
NIHR Research Delivery Network · GBUniversity of Southampton · GBUniversity of Salford · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAfter amputation, many people become less active, feel lonely and lose independence. Understanding the factors associated with low physical activity levels and participation could contribute to defining key interventions which can support prosthesis users so they can live a more active and socially included lifestyle. This longitudinal observational study aims to assess relationships between physical activity, community participation, prosthetic fit, comfort and user satisfaction using actimetry, 3D scans and questionnaires in a Cambodian cohort of established lower limb prosthesis users.

methodsTwenty participants (5F:15M, nine transfemoral, eleven transtibial, 24-60 years old and 3-43 years since amputation) were recruited. They completed a questionnaire which included their demographics, community participation, prosthesis satisfaction and comfort at the start of the study, and between three and six months later. Their prosthetic sockets and residual limbs were 3D scanned at the start and end of the study. Accelerometers were embedded under the cosmesis on the shank of the prosthesis, to collect ten weeks of activity data.

resultsParticipants averaged 4470 steps/day (743-7315 steps/day), and wore their prosthesis for most waking hours, averaging 13.4 h/day (4.5-17.6 h/day). Self-reported measures of activity and hours of wear correlated with these accelerometer data (Spearman's rho r

conclusionAssociations between perceived and measured activity levels correlated with socket satisfaction in this cohort of people with established lower limb amputations. The small sample size means these correlations should be interpreted with caution, but they indicate variables worthy of further study to understand barriers to community engagement and physical activity for prosthesis users in Cambodia, and potentially in other settings.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsAdultAmputation StumpsAsian PeopleCohort StudiesCommunity ParticipationHumansMiddle AgedYoung Adult3D scanningAccelerometerActivityComfortCommunity participationLimb volumeLower-limb prosthesisLow resourced countryOutcome measures

Identifiers

PMID35501879
PMCPMC9059463
OpenAlexW4225281571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.