Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501797›Full record

Observational studyBMC palliative care2022

Cancer patients spend more time at home and more often die at home with advance care planning conversations in primary health care: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Bardo Driller, Bente Talseth-Palmer, Torstein Hole, Kjell Erik Strømskag, Anne-Tove Brenne

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC palliative care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. A novel patient-centered outcome in cancer care, days at home: a scoping review and guide for its future use.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bardo DrillerDepartment of Oncology and Department for Research and Innovation, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Åsehaugen 1, N-6026, Ålesund, Norway. bardo.driller@helse-mr.no.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3611-5080
Bente Talseth-PalmerSchool of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, College of Health, Medicine and Wellbeing, University of Newcastle, Australia and NSW Health Pathology, New South Wales, Australia.
Torstein HoleOperating department, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway.
Kjell Erik StrømskagDepartment of Surgery and Emergency Medicine Molde Hospital, Møre and Romsdal Hospital Trust, Molde, Norway.
Anne-Tove BrenneDepartment of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSpending time at home and dying at home is advocated to be a desirable outcome in palliative care (PC). In Norway, home deaths among cancer patients are rare compared to other European countries. Advance care planning (ACP) conversations enable patients to define goals and preferences, reflecting a person's wishes and current medical condition.

methodThe study included 250 cancer patients in the Romsdal region with or without an ACP conversation in primary health care who died between September 2018 and August 2020. The patients were identified through their contact with the local hospital, cancer outpatient clinic or hospital-based PC team.

resultsDuring the last 90 days of life, patients who had an ACP conversation in primary health care (N=125) were mean 9.8 more days at home, 4.5 less days in nursing home and 5.3 less days in hospital. Having an ACP conversation in primary health care, being male or having a lower age significantly predicted more days at home at the end of life (p< .001). Patients with an ACP conversation in primary health care where significantly more likely to die at home (p< .001) with a four times higher probability (RR=4.5). Contact with the hospital-based PC team was not associated with more days at home or death at home. Patients with contact with the hospital-based PC team were more likely to have an ACP conversation in primary health care.

conclusionPalliative cancer patients with an ACP conversation in primary health care spent more days at home and more frequently died at home. Data suggest it is important that ACP conversations are conducted in primary health care setting.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningNeoplasmsTerminal CareFemaleHumansMalePrimary Health CareRetrospective StudiesAdvance Care PlanningCancerHome CareHome deathPalliative CarePlace of deathPrimary Health Care

Identifiers

PMID35501797
PMCPMC9063101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.