Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501771›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

A protocol to clinically evaluate liquid biopsies as a tool to speed up diagnosis of children and young adults with aggressive infection-related lymphoma in East Africa "(AI-REAL)".

Ismail D Legason, Martin D Ogwang, Clara Chamba, Elifuraha Mkwizu, Claire El Mouden, Hadija Mwinula, Lulu Chirande, Anna Schuh, Faraja Chiwanga

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ismail D LegasonAI-REAL Study, St Mary's Hospital Lacor, Gulu& African Field Epidemiology Network, 180, Gulu-Uganda. African Field Epidemiology Network, 12874, Kampala, Uganda. legason2k@yahoo.com.
Martin D OgwangAI-REAL Study, St Mary's Hospital Lacor, Gulu& African Field Epidemiology Network, 180, Gulu-Uganda. African Field Epidemiology Network, 12874, Kampala, Uganda.
Clara ChambaAI-REAL Study, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Elifuraha MkwizuAI-REAL Study, Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Center, Moshi, Tanzania.
Claire El MoudenAI-REAL Study, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Hadija MwinulaMolecular Diagnostic Center, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Lulu ChirandeAI-REAL Study, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salam, Tanzania.
Anna SchuhAI-REAL Study, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Faraja ChiwangaAI-REAL Study, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
Muhimbili National Hospital · TZMuhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences · TZAfrican Field Epidemiology Network · UGKilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre · TZSt. Mary's Hospital Lacor · UGUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

National Institute for Health Research NIHR200133
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe capacity for invasive tissue biopsies followed by histopathology diagnosis in sub-Saharan Africa is severely limited. Consequently, many cancer patients are diagnosed late and outcomes are poor. Here, we propose to evaluate circulating tumour (ct) DNA analysis ("liquid biopsy"), a less invasive and faster approach to diagnose endemic EBV-driven lymphomas (EBVL) in East Africa.

methodsWe will evaluate the clinical utility of an already validated ctDNA test prospectively in a head-to-head comparison against histopathology. The primary endpoint is the time from presentation to the specialist centre to a final diagnosis of EBV- Lymphoma. Secondary endpoints include the sensitivity and specificity of liquid biopsy and health economic benefits over histopathology. One hundred forty-six patients will be recruited over 18 months. Patients will be eligible if they are 3-30 years of age and have provided written consent or assent as per IRB guidelines. Tissue and venous blood samples will be processed as per established protocols. Clinical data will be captured securely and in real-time into a REDCap database. The time from presentation to diagnosis will be documented. The sensitivity and specificity of the methods can be estimated within 5% error margin with 95% confidence level using 73 cases and 73 controls. Health-economic assessment will include micro-costing of ctDNA test and histopathology. All results will be reviewed in a multidisciplinary tumour board. DISCUSSION: The study evaluates the clinical utility of ctDNA in improving the speed of diagnostic pathways for EBVL in sub-Saharan Africa. Our results would provide proof-of-principle that ctDNA can be used as a diagnostic tool in areas without access to regular pathology, that transfer of the tool is feasible, and that it leads to an earlier and faster diagnosis. The potential clinical and economic impact of this proposal is thus significant. If successful, this study will provide appropriate, and cost-effective diagnostic tools that will promote earlier diagnosis of EBVL and potentially other cancers in countries with restricted healthcare resources.

trial registrationPan African Clinical Trials Registry:  PACTR202204822312651 , registered on 14th-April-2022.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNALymphoma, Non-HodgkinNeoplasmsAfrica, EasternBiomarkers, TumorChildHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansLiquid BiopsyYoung AdultBiomarkers, TumorCirculating Tumor DNActDNAEast AfricaEBV-driven lymphomaHistopathologyLiquid biopsyProtocol

Identifiers

PMID35501771
PMCPMC9059110
OpenAlexW4225275359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.