Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501699›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2022

Providing antibiotics to immigrants: a qualitative study of general practitioners' and pharmacists' experiences.

Dominique L A Lescure, Wilbert van Oorschot, Rob Brouwer, Janneke van der Velden, Aimée M L Tjon-A-Tsien, Iris V Bonnema, Theo J M Verheij, Jan Hendrik Richardus, Hélène A C M Voeten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Dominique L A LescureDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Wilbert van OorschotHealth Centre Zuidplein, Strevelsweg 700, 3083 AS, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rob BrouwerHealth Centre Levinas, Pharmacy Ramleh, Noordeinde 97a, 3061 EM, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Janneke van der VeldenPharos (Dutch Centre of Expertise On Health Disparities), Arthur van Schendelstraat 600, 3511 MJ, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Aimée M L Tjon-A-TsienMunicipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Schiedamsedijk 95, 3011 EN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Iris V BonnemaMunicipal Public Health Service Rotterdam-Rijnmond, Schiedamsedijk 95, 3011 EN, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Theo J M VerheijJulius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Jan Hendrik RichardusDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Hélène A C M VoetenDepartment of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. hacm.voeten@rotterdam.nl.
GGD Rotterdam-Rijnmond · NLErasmus MC · NLGGD Zuid Limburg · NLUniversity Medical Center Utrecht · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIf healthcare professionals perceive that patients strongly expect to be prescribed antibiotics, inappropriate prescriptions may result. As it is unknown whether this happens more often with certain patient groups, we explored whether general practitioners (GPs) and pharmacists perceived such expectations when they provided antibiotics to immigrant patients.

methodsTen GPs and five pharmacists from Rotterdam, the Netherlands, were interviewed on the basis of a semi-structured topic guide. Atlas.ti software was then used to conduct a thematic analysis.

resultsGPs felt that immigrant patients, especially those who had arrived recently, were more likely to expect to receive antibiotics than native Dutch patients. However, these expectations had decreased over the last years and did not always lead immigrants to exert pressure on them. Except for language barriers, the factors reported by GPs to influence their antibiotic prescribing behaviour were unrelated to patients' immigrant background. If there was a language barrier, GPs experienced greater diagnostic uncertainty and needed additional time to obtain and communicate correct information. To overcome language barriers, they often used point-of-care testing to convince patients that antibiotics were unnecessary. Although pharmacists rarely experienced problems dispensing antibiotics to immigrants, they and GPs both struggled to find effective ways of overcoming language barriers, and stressed the need for multi-language support materials.

conclusionWhile pharmacists rarely experience any problems providing antibiotics to immigrants, GPs regularly face language barriers with immigrant patients, which complicate the diagnostic process and communicating information in the limited available time. This sometimes leads antibiotics to be prescribed inappropriately.

Indexed as

Emigrants and ImmigrantsGeneral PractitionersAnti-Bacterial AgentsHumansPharmacistsQualitative ResearchAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibioticsCommunicationHealthcare professionalsImmigrantsPatient pressurePrimary care

Identifiers

PMID35501699
PMCPMC9058745
OpenAlexW4225278678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.