Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501696›Full record

ArticleBMC bioinformatics2022

GEMmaker: process massive RNA-seq datasets on heterogeneous computational infrastructure.

John A Hadish, Tyler D Biggs, Benjamin T Shealy, M Reed Bender, Coleman B McKnight, Connor Wytko, Melissa C Smith, F Alex Feltus, Loren Honaas, Stephen P Ficklin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

John A HadishMolecular Plant Sciences Program, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Tyler D BiggsDepartment of Horticulture, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Benjamin T ShealyDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
M Reed BenderBiomedical Data Science and Informatics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Coleman B McKnightDepartment of Genetics and Biochemistry, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Connor WytkoDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
Melissa C SmithDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
F Alex FeltusBiomedical Data Science and Informatics, Clemson University, Clemson, SC, USA.
Loren HonaasUSDA Agricultural Research Service, Wenatchee, WA, USA.
Stephen P FicklinMolecular Plant Sciences Program, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA. stephen.ficklin@wsu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9138-6292

Funding

McIntyre Stennis WNP00009National Science Foundation 1659300U.S. Department of Agriculture 1014919Washington State University Emerging Research InitiativesWashington State University Food Security program awardWashington State University Livestock HealthWashington Tree Fruit Research Commission AP-19-103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundQuantification of gene expression from RNA-seq data is a prerequisite for transcriptome analysis such as differential gene expression analysis and gene co-expression network construction. Individual RNA-seq experiments are larger and combining multiple experiments from sequence repositories can result in datasets with thousands of samples. Processing hundreds to thousands of RNA-seq data can result in challenges related to data management, access to sufficient computational resources, navigation of high-performance computing (HPC) systems, installation of required software dependencies, and reproducibility. Processing of larger and deeper RNA-seq experiments will become more common as sequencing technology matures.

resultsGEMmaker, is a nf-core compliant, Nextflow workflow, that quantifies gene expression from small to massive RNA-seq datasets. GEMmaker ensures results are highly reproducible through the use of versioned containerized software that can be executed on a single workstation, institutional compute cluster, Kubernetes platform or the cloud. GEMmaker supports popular alignment and quantification tools providing results in raw and normalized formats. GEMmaker is unique in that it can scale to process thousands of local or remote stored samples without exceeding available data storage.

conclusionsWorkflows that quantify gene expression are not new, and many already address issues of portability, reusability, and scale in terms of access to CPUs. GEMmaker provides these benefits and adds the ability to scale despite low data storage infrastructure. This allows users to process hundreds to thousands of RNA-seq samples even when data storage resources are limited. GEMmaker is freely available and fully documented with step-by-step setup and execution instructions.

Indexed as

High-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingSoftwareReproducibility of ResultsRNA-SeqSequence Analysis, RNADifferential gene expressionGene co-expression networkGene expression matrixNextflowRNA-seqWorkflows

Identifiers

PMID35501696
PMCPMC9063052

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.