ArticleMolecular imaging and biology2022
Comparison of [
Article in Molecular imaging and biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Intensifying treatment in PET-positive multiple myeloma patients after upfront autologous stem cell transplantation.Leukemia · 2023Trial
- Diagnostic Innovations: Advances in imaging techniques for diagnosis and follow-up of multiple myeloma.Journal of bone oncology · 2025Review
- New Developments in Myeloma Treatment and Response Assessment.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2023Article
- Review
- Head-to-Head Comparison between FDG andDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Functional Imaging in the Evaluation of Treatment Response in Multiple Myeloma: The Role of PET-CT and MRI.Journal of personalized medicine · 2022Review
- Metabolic features of myeloma cells in the context of bone microenvironment: Implication for the pathophysiology and clinic of myeloma bone disease.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose[ PROCEDURES: Thirteen newly diagnosed transplant eligible MM patients were imaged both with [
resultsNine subjects were assessed positively by [
conclusionsBased on this pilot study, [
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.