Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501556›Full record

ArticleLearning & behavior2022

Partial reinforcement effects on acquisition and extinction of a conditioned taste aversion.

Mark E Bouton, Noelle L Michaud

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Learning & behavior, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. An analysis of reinstatement after extinction of a conditioned taste aversion.Journal of experimental psychology. Animal learning and cognition · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark E BoutonDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA. Mark.Bouton@uvm.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-6601-2977
Noelle L MichaudDepartment of Psychological Science, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.

Funding

Extinction and Recovery in Associative LearningR01DA033123 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT & ST AGRIC COLLEGE · PI BOUTON, MARK E · 2012 to 2021
$3.6M
NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA033123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Four experiments with rat subjects asked whether a partial reinforcement extinction effect (PREE) occurs in taste aversion learning. The question has received little attention in the literature, and to our knowledge no taste aversion experiment has previously demonstrated a PREE. In each of the present experiments, experimental groups received a taste mixed in drinking water for 20 min; such taste exposures were sometimes paired with a lithium chloride (LiCl) injection and sometimes not. Control groups received only taste-LiCl pairings. There was evidence that each reinforced and non-reinforced trial produced increments and decrements in aversion strength (respectively), and trials mattered more than accumulated time during the conditioned stimulus and during the background (as emphasized in time-accumulation models like those of Gallistel and Gibbon, Psychological Review, 107, 289-344, 2000, and Gibbon and Balsam, Autoshaping and conditioning theory, Academic Press, New York, pp. 219-235, 1981). In addition, a partial reinforcement extinction effect was observed when there was a relatively large number of conditioning trials. The results extend our understanding of extinction in taste aversion learning and provide more evidence that aversion learning might follow rules that are qualitatively similar to those of other forms of learning.

Indexed as

Avoidance LearningExtinction, PsychologicalAnimalsConditioning, ClassicalHumansHylobatesLithium ChlorideRatsReinforcement, PsychologyLithium ChlorideAcquisitionBiological constraints on learningExtinctionTaste aversion learning

Identifiers

PMID35501556
PMCPMC10204607

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.