Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501512›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2022

MRI-based radiomics to predict response in locally advanced rectal cancer: comparison of manual and automatic segmentation on external validation in a multicentre study.

Arianna Defeudis, Simone Mazzetti, Jovana Panic, Monica Micilotta, Lorenzo Vassallo, Giuliana Giannetto, Marco Gatti, Riccardo Faletti, Stefano Cirillo, Daniele Regge and 1 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Arianna DefeudisDepartment of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy. arianna.defeudis@unito.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1745-3044
Simone MazzettiDepartment of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Jovana PanicDepartment of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Monica MicilottaMauriziano hospital, Turin, Italy.
Lorenzo VassalloRadiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Giuliana GiannettoDepartment of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Marco GattiRadiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Riccardo FalettiRadiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
Stefano CirilloMauriziano hospital, Turin, Italy.
Daniele ReggeDepartment of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.
Valentina GianniniDepartment of Radiology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is achieved in 15-30% of cases. Our aim was to implement and externally validate a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics pipeline to predict response to treatment and to investigate the impact of manual and automatic segmentations on the radiomics models.

methodsNinety-five patients with stage II/III LARC who underwent multiparametric MRI before chemoradiotherapy and surgical treatment were enrolled from three institutions. Patients were classified as responders if tumour regression grade was 1 or 2 and nonresponders otherwise. Sixty-seven patients composed the construction dataset, while 28 the external validation. Tumour volumes were manually and automatically segmented using a U-net algorithm. Three approaches for feature selection were tested and combined with four machine learning classifiers.

resultsUsing manual segmentation, the best result reached an accuracy of 68% on the validation set, with sensitivity 60%, specificity 77%, negative predictive value (NPV) 63%, and positive predictive value (PPV) 75%. The automatic segmentation achieved an accuracy of 75% on the validation set, with sensitivity 80%, specificity 69%, and both NPV and PPV 75%. Sensitivity and NPV on the validation set were significantly higher (p = 0.047) for the automatic versus manual segmentation.

conclusionOur study showed that radiomics models can pave the way to help clinicians in the prediction of tumour response to chemoradiotherapy of LARC and to personalise per-patient treatment. The results from the external validation dataset are promising for further research into radiomics approaches using both manual and automatic segmentations.

Indexed as

Rectal NeoplasmsRectumChemoradiotherapyHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNeoadjuvant TherapyArtificial intelligenceMachine learningMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingNeoadjuvant therapyRectal neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID35501512
PMCPMC9061921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.