Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501429›Full record

SynthesisNeuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology2022

A meta-analysis of conditioned fear generalization in anxiety-related disorders.

Samuel E Cooper, Eva A M van Dis, Muriel A Hagenaars, Angelos-Miltiadis Krypotos, Charles B Nemeroff, Shmuel Lissek, Iris M Engelhard, Joseph E Dunsmoor

Open access · bronzeAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
19.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. iScience · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Samuel E CooperDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. samuel.cooper@austin.utexas.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9563-1750
Eva A M van DisDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Muriel A HagenaarsDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Angelos-Miltiadis KrypotosDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Charles B NemeroffDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.
Shmuel LissekDepartment of Psychology, University of Minnesota-Twin Cities, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Iris M EngelhardDepartment of Clinical Psychology, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Joseph E DunsmoorDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA. joseph.dunsmoor@austin.utexas.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-5448-6873
Utrecht University · NLThe University of Texas at Austin · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Localizing and modulating competing memories of fear and safety in the human brainR01MH122387 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI DUNSMOOR, JOSEPH EDWARD · 2021 to 2025
$2.7M
Neurobehavioral Mechanisms of Higher-Order and Conceptual Fear and Avoidance Generalization in Anxiety PsychopathologyF32MH129136 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI COOPER, SAMUEL EMERSON · 2022 to 2023
$115k
NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH129136NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH122387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Generalization of conditioned fear is adaptive in some situations but maladaptive when fear excessively generalizes to innocuous stimuli with incidental resemblance to a genuine threat cue. Recently, empirical interest in fear generalization as a transdiagnostic explanatory mechanism underlying anxiety-related disorders has accelerated. As there are now several studies of fear generalization across multiple types of anxiety-related disorders, the authors conducted a meta-analysis of studies reporting behavioral measures (subjective ratings and psychophysiological indices) of fear generalization in anxiety-related disorder vs. comparison groups. We conducted systematic searches of electronic databases (conducted from January-October 2020) for fear generalization studies involving anxiety-related disorder groups or subclinical analog groups. A total of 300 records were full-text screened and two unpublished datasets were obtained, yielding 16 studies reporting behavioral fear generalization measures. Random-effects meta-analytic models and meta-regressions were applied to the identified data. Fear generalization was significantly heightened in anxiety-related disorder participants (N = 439) relative to comparison participants (N = 428). We did not identify any significant clinical, sample, or methodological moderators. Heightened fear generalization is quantitatively supported as distinguishing anxiety-related disorder groups from comparison groups. Evidence suggests this effect is transdiagnostic, relatively robust to experimental or sample parameters, and that generalization paradigms are a well-supported framework for neurobehavioral investigations of learning and emotion in anxiety-related disorders. We discuss these findings in the context of prior fear conditioning meta-analyses, past neuroimaging investigations of fear generalization in anxiety-related disorders, and future directions and challenges for the field.

Indexed as

Conditioning, ClassicalGeneralization, PsychologicalAnxietyAnxiety DisordersFearHumans

Identifiers

PMID35501429
PMCPMC9283469
OpenAlexW4225288522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.