Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501421›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Discordant American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification between anesthesiologists and surgeons and its correlation with adverse patient outcomes.

Charlene Xian Wen Kwa, Jiaqian Cui, Daniel Yan Zheng Lim, Yilin Eileen Sim, Yuhe Ke, Hairil Rizal Abdullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Comorbidity data collection across different spine registries: an evidence map.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Charlene Xian Wen KwaDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Jiaqian CuiDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Daniel Yan Zheng LimHealth Service Research Unit, Medical Board, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Yilin Eileen SimDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Yuhe KeDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore.
Hairil Rizal AbdullahDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Singapore General Hospital, Outram Road, Singapore, 169608, Singapore. hairil.rizal.abdullah@singhealth.com.sg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification (ASA) is used for communication of patient health status, risk scoring, benchmarking and financial claims. Prior studies using hypothetical scenarios have shown poor concordance of ASA classification among healthcare providers. There is a paucity of studies using clinical data, and of clinical factors or patient outcomes associated with discordant classification. The study aims to assess ASA classification concordance between surgeons and anesthesiologists, factors surrounding discordance and its impact on patient outcomes. This retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary medical center on 46,284 consecutive patients undergoing elective surgery between January 2017 and December 2019. The ASA class showed moderate concordance (weighted Cohen's κ 0.53) between surgeons and anesthesiologists. We found significant associations between discordant classification and patient comorbidities, age and race. Patients with discordant classification had a higher risk of 30-day mortality (odds ratio (OR) 2.00, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.52-2.62, p < 0.0001), 1-year mortality (OR 1.53, 95% CI = 1.38-1.69, p < 0.0001), and Intensive Care Unit admission > 24 h (OR 1.69, 95% CI = 1.47-1.94, p < 0.0001). Hence, there is a need for improved standardization of ASA scoring and cross-specialty review in ASA-discordant cases.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologistsSurgeonsElective Surgical ProceduresHumansOdds RatioRetrospective StudiesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID35501421
PMCPMC9061797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.