Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501411›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Development and validation of an interpretable clinical score for early identification of acute kidney injury at the emergency department.

Yukai Ang, Siqi Li, Marcus Eng Hock Ong, Feng Xie, Su Hooi Teo, Lina Choong, Riece Koniman, Bibhas Chakraborty, Andrew Fu Wah Ho, Nan Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Artificial intelligence for early diagnosis in emergency department.Journal of anesthesia, analgesia and critical care · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Yukai Ang *Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Siqi Li *Duke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Marcus Eng Hock OngDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Feng XieDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Su Hooi TeoDepartment of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Lina ChoongDepartment of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Riece KonimanDepartment of Renal Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Bibhas ChakrabortyDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Andrew Fu Wah HoDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Nan LiuDuke-NUS Medical School, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore. liu.nan@duke-nus.edu.sg.
Duke-NUS Medical School · SGNational University of Singapore · SGSingapore General Hospital · SGSingHealth · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute kidney injury (AKI) in hospitalised patients is a common syndrome associated with poorer patient outcomes. Clinical risk scores can be used for the early identification of patients at risk of AKI. We conducted a retrospective study using electronic health records of Singapore General Hospital emergency department patients who were admitted from 2008 to 2016. The primary outcome was inpatient AKI of any stage within 7 days of admission based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcome (KDIGO) 2012 guidelines. A machine learning-based framework AutoScore was used to generate clinical scores from the study sample which was randomly divided into training, validation and testing cohorts. Model performance was evaluated using area under the curve (AUC). Among the 119,468 admissions, 10,693 (9.0%) developed AKI. 8491 were stage 1 (79.4%), 906 stage 2 (8.5%) and 1296 stage 3 (12.1%). The AKI Risk Score (AKI-RiSc) was a summation of the integer scores of 6 variables: serum creatinine, serum bicarbonate, pulse, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and age. AUC of AKI-RiSc was 0.730 (95% CI 0.714-0.747), outperforming an existing AKI Prediction Score model which achieved AUC of 0.665 (95% CI 0.646-0.679) on the testing cohort. At a cut-off of 4 points, AKI-RiSc had a sensitivity of 82.6% and specificity of 46.7%. AKI-RiSc is a simple clinical score that can be easily implemented on the ground for early identification of AKI and potentially be applied in international settings.

Indexed as

Acute Kidney InjuryCreatinineEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentCreatinine

Identifiers

PMID35501411
PMCPMC9061747
OpenAlexW4225274339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.