ArticleScientific reports2022
Methods for testing solubility of hydraulic calcium silicate cements for root-end filling.
Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Outcome and erosion of root-end filling materials following endodontic apical surgery: a minimum follow-up of 4 years.Clinical oral investigations · 2026Article
- Physico-chemical analysis of eight pre-mixed hydraulic silicate sealers.Frontiers in dental medicine · 2026Article
- The Effect of Set Conditions on Volumetric Changes of Different Hydraulic Cements: An In Vitro Root-End Model.International dental journal · 2025Article
- Physicochemical properties and periodontal ligament stem cell response to NeoMTA 2.Clinical oral investigations · 2025Article
- Assessment of volume and depth loss of incompletely set hydraulic calcium silicate cements used as root-end fillings in a simulated surgical model.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Physicochemical evaluation of mineral trioxide aggregate and five mineral oxides calcium silicate-based cements.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of Microhardness and Compressive Strength of Mineral Trioxide Aggregate Modified by Addition of Short Glass Fibers and Shredded Polyglycolic Acid Sutures.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Assessment of a Light-Curable Hydrogel to Be Used for Root Canal Obturation.Journal of dental research · 2025Article
- Influence of Bioceramic Clinker particle size, radiopacifier, and liquids on their physicochemical properties.Brazilian dental journal · 2025Article
- Color stability and solubility of Biodentine and NeoPutty in contact with different irrigation solutions.Restorative dentistry & endodontics · 2024Article
- In Vitro Comparison of Differences in Setting Time of Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Mineral Trioxide Aggregate According to Moisture Content of Gypsum.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fabrication and characterisation of novel algin incorporated bioactive-glass 58S calcium-silicate-based root canal sealer.Journal of dental sciences · 2023Article
- Fast-Setting Calcium Silicate-Based Pulp Capping Cements-Integrated Antibacterial, Irritation and Cytocompatibility Assessment.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Regulatory testing of hydraulic cements used in dentistry and standard test methods for root-end filling materials do not exist. The aim of this study was to identify a simple, reproducible method for testing the solubility of materials that set with water (hydraulic) used as root-end filling materials in dentistry. Commercial and prototype hydraulic cements were characterized by scanning electron microscopy and X-ray diffraction analyses and their solubilities were determined using ISO 6876; 2012 standard, a modified ISO 6876 method with media alternative to water and a new method measuring the percentage mass loss and volume change of materials (micro-CT method) from a single surface exposed to three solutions. The solubility testing was performed by three operators to enable an intra-laboratory comparison. The solubility data obtained from the two commercial and two prototype materials varied depending on the method used, with the ISO 6876 method identifying differences in solubility of the materials (p < 0.05) but when modified with alternative solutions, no differences were found (p > 0.05). The changes in solution thus effected the solubility of the tested materials. Inter-operator differences were observed with the weight changes determined from the new method indicating this method was not robust. The weight and volume assessments using the new method were not solution-dependent. The advantage of the proposed method compared with the ISO standard is its simplicity, enabling a number of tests to be performed on the same set of samples that also more closely mimics the clinical environment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.