Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501317›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

Bacterial communities associated with silage of different forage crops in Malaysian climate analysed using 16S amplicon metagenomics.

Minhalina Badrul Hisham, Amalia Mohd Hashim, Nursyuhaida Mohd Hanafi, Norafizah Abdul Rahman, Nur Elina Abdul Mutalib, Chun Keat Tan, Muhamad Hazim Nazli, Nur Fatihah Mohd Yusoff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The Role of Microbes in Ensiling.Microorganisms · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Utilisation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. TheFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Minhalina Badrul HishamAgro-Biotechnology Malaysia Institutes (ABI), National Institutes of Biotechnology Malaysia (NIBM), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), c/o MARDI Headquarters, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.
Amalia Mohd HashimDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. amalia@upm.edu.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8320-0141
Nursyuhaida Mohd HanafiAgro-Biotechnology Malaysia Institutes (ABI), National Institutes of Biotechnology Malaysia (NIBM), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), c/o MARDI Headquarters, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. nursyuhaida@nibm.my.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4681-6702
Norafizah Abdul RahmanAgro-Biotechnology Malaysia Institutes (ABI), National Institutes of Biotechnology Malaysia (NIBM), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), c/o MARDI Headquarters, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2113-3553
Nur Elina Abdul Mutalib *Institutes for Health Systems Research, National Institutes of Health Malaysia (NIH), 40170, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8953-8269
Chun Keat Tan *Agro-Biotechnology Malaysia Institutes (ABI), National Institutes of Biotechnology Malaysia (NIBM), Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation (MOSTI), c/o MARDI Headquarters, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5883-5962
Muhamad Hazim NazliDepartment of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8171-8660
Nur Fatihah Mohd YusoffDepartment of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, 43400, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0655-0658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Silage produced in tropical countries is prone to spoilage because of high humidity and temperature. Therefore, determining indigenous bacteria as potential inoculants is important to improve silage quality. This study aimed to determine bacterial community and functional changes associated with ensiling using amplicon metagenomics and to predict potential bacterial additives associated with silage quality in the Malaysian climate. Silages of two forage crops (sweet corn and Napier) were prepared, and their fermentation properties and functional bacterial communities were analysed. After ensiling, both silages were predominated by lactic acid bacteria (LAB), and they exhibited good silage quality with significant increment in lactic acid, reductions in pH and water-soluble carbohydrates, low level of acetic acid and the absence of propionic and butyric acid. LAB consortia consisting of homolactic and heterolactic species were proposed to be the potential bacterial additives for sweet corn and Napier silage fermentation. Tax4fun functional prediction revealed metabolic pathways related to fermentation activities (bacterial division, carbohydrate transport and catabolism, and secondary metabolite production) were enriched in ensiled crops (p < 0.05). These results might suggest active transport and metabolism of plant carbohydrates into a usable form to sustain bacterial reproduction during silage fermentation, yielding metabolic products such as lactic acid. This research has provided a comprehensive understanding of bacterial communities before and after ensiling, which can be useful for desirable silage fermentation in Malaysia.

Indexed as

MetagenomicsSilageBacteriaCarbohydratesCrops, AgriculturalLactic AcidCarbohydratesLactic Acid

Identifiers

PMID35501317
PMCPMC9061801

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.