ReviewHematology/oncology clinics of North America2022
Screening for Colorectal Cancer.
Review in Hematology/oncology clinics of North America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 116 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
116 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Area-level socioeconomic status is associated with colorectal cancer screening, incidence and mortality in the US: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Social science & medicine (1982) · 2025Pooled it
- The role of Adiponectin and Leptin in Colorectal Cancer and Adenoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC cancer · 2025Pooled it
- AGA Clinical Practice Update on Risk Stratification for Colorectal Cancer Screening and Post-Polypectomy Surveillance: Expert Review.Gastroenterology · 2023Guideline
- Evaluation efficacy and accuracy of a real-time computer-aided polyp detection system during colonoscopy: a prospective, multicentric, randomized, parallel-controlled study trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Trial
- Trial
- Identifying clinical and lifestyle factor mediators of the association between socioeconomic status and colorectal cancer mortality.SSM - population health · 2026Article
- Effects of Telerehabilitation on Functional and Other Health-Related Outcomes in Colorectal Cancer Patients and Survivors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2026Review
- MKRN1 suppresses cuproptosis in colorectal cancer through ubiquitin-dependent regulation of SLC31A1.Biological procedures online · 2026Article
- Endoplasmic reticulum stress promotes colorectal cancer proliferation by regulating autophagy via XBP1s.Translational cancer research · 2026Article
- RNA Metabolism Genes as Prognostic Biomarkers and Therapeutic Targets in Colorectal Cancer Based on the Analysis of Single-Cell and Bulk-RNA Sequencing Data.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Survey on changes in colorectal cancer screening participation at Minamisoma city after the Great East Japan earthquake using clustering analysis.Public health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward screening of colorectal cancer among adults in Kuwait primary health care centers.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2026Article
- Colorectal Cancer Screening and Mortality Trends in the United States Over 25 Years: A Story of Success and Inequity.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2026Article
- Temporal change in skeletal muscle index as a predictor of recurrence for patients with locally advanced colorectal malignancy: a retrospective cohort study.Cancer imaging : the official publication of the International Cancer Imaging Society · 2026Article
- Insect Olfactory Receptor-Expressing Sensor Cells for Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis Using Urine Samples.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Association of active endoscopy nurse participation with adenoma detection during screening colonoscopy: a retrospective cohort study.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Residential segregation and late-stage colorectal cancer in the United States: a population-based study of 1.2 million adults.American journal of epidemiology · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of bowel preparation quality for colonoscopy: a survey of outpatients and inpatients.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Proteomic analysis revealed the potential usefulness of faecal extracellular vesicles in colorectal cancer diagnosis.Scientific reports · 2026Article
56 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer death in the United States. Screening reduces CRC incidence and mortality. 2021 US Preventive Service Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines and available evidence support routine screening from ages 45 to 75, and individualized consideration of screening ages 76 to 85. USPSTF guidelines recommend annual guaiac fecal occult blood testing, annual fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), annual to every 3-year multitarget stool DNA-FIT, every 5-year sigmoidoscopy, every 10-year sigmoidoscopy with annual FIT, every 5-year computed tomographic colonography, and every 10-year colonoscopy as options for screening. The "best test is the one that gets done."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.