Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501156›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2022

Dopaminergic Modulation of Dynamic Emotion Perception.

B A Schuster, S Sowden, A J Rybicki, D S Fraser, C Press, P Holland, J L Cook

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Feedback on Mental State Inferences Improves Accuracy and Awareness.Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006) · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

B A SchusterSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom biancaschuster05@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5584-2078
S SowdenSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
A J RybickiSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
D S FraserSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
C PressDepartment of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck University of London, London, WC1E 7HX, United Kingdom.
P HollandDepartment of Psychology, Goldsmiths University of London, London, SE14 6NW, United Kingdom.
J L CookSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, B15 2TT, United Kingdom.
University of Birmingham · GBGoldsmiths University of London · GBWellcome Centre for Human Neuroimaging · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Emotion recognition abilities are fundamental to our everyday social interaction. A large number of clinical populations show impairments in this domain, with emotion recognition atypicalities being particularly prevalent among disorders exhibiting a dopamine system disruption (e.g., Parkinson's disease). Although this suggests a role for dopamine in emotion recognition, studies employing dopamine manipulation in healthy volunteers have exhibited mixed neural findings and no behavioral modulation. Interestingly, while a dependence of dopaminergic drug effects on individual baseline dopamine function has been well established in other cognitive domains, the emotion recognition literature so far has failed to account for these possible interindividual differences. The present within-subjects study therefore tested the effects of the dopamine D2 antagonist haloperidol on emotion recognition from dynamic, whole-body stimuli while accounting for interindividual differences in baseline dopamine. A total of 33 healthy male and female adults rated emotional point-light walkers (PLWs) once after ingestion of 2.5 mg haloperidol and once after placebo. To evaluate potential mechanistic pathways of the dopaminergic modulation of emotion recognition, participants also performed motoric and counting-based indices of temporal processing. Confirming our hypotheses, effects of haloperidol on emotion recognition depended on baseline dopamine function, where individuals with low baseline dopamine showed enhanced, and those with high baseline dopamine decreased emotion recognition. Drug effects on emotion recognition were related to drug effects on movement-based and explicit timing mechanisms, indicating possible mediating effects of temporal processing. Results highlight the need for future studies to account for baseline dopamine and suggest putative mechanisms underlying the dopaminergic modulation of emotion recognition.

Indexed as

DopamineHaloperidolAdultDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsEmotionsFemaleHumansMalePerceptionDopamineDopamine D2 Receptor AntagonistsHaloperidolcognitiondopamineemotionpsychopharmacologytemporal processingworking memory

Identifiers

PMID35501156
PMCPMC9145228
OpenAlexW4225286357

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.