Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501122›Full record

ArticleMedical humanities2022

Exploring the intersection of critical disability studies, humanities and global health through a case study of scarf injuries in Bangladesh.

Anna Tupetz, Marion Quirici, Mohsina Sultana, Kazi Imdadul Hoque, Kearsley Alison Stewart, Michel Landry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical humanities, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Anna TupetzSurgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Marion QuiriciThompson Writing Program, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Mohsina SultanaDirectorate of General Health Services (DGHS), Government of Mohakhali, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Kazi Imdadul HoquePhysical Rehabilitation Program (PRP), International Committee of the Red Cross, Cox's Bazar, Bangladesh.
Kearsley Alison StewartDuke Global Health Institute, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Michel LandryDepartment of Health and Functioning, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences, Bergen, Hordaland, Norway mike.landry@hvl.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article puts critical disability studies and global health into conversation around the phenomenon of scarf injury in Bangladesh. Scarf injury occurs when a woman wearing a long, traditional scarf called an orna rides in a recently introduced autorickshaw with a design flaw that allows the orna to become entangled in the vehicle's driveshaft. Caught in the engine, the orna pulls the woman's neck into hyperextension, causing a debilitating high cervical spinal cord injury and quadriplegia. The circumstances of the scarf injury reveal the need for more critical cultural analysis than the fields of global health and rehabilitation typically offer. First, the fatal design flaw of the vehicle reflects different norms of gender and dress in China, where the vehicle is manufactured, versus Bangladesh, where the vehicle is purchased at a low price and assembled on-site-a situation that calls transnational capitalist modes of production and exchange into question. Second, the experiences of women with scarf injuries entail many challenges beyond the injury itself: the transition to life with disability following the rehabilitation period is made more difficult by negative perceptions of disability, lack of resources and accessible infrastructure, and cultural norms of gender and class in Bangladesh. Our cross-disciplinary conversation about women with scarf injuries, involving critical disability studies, global health and rehabilitation experts, exposes the shortcomings of each of these fields but also illustrates the urgent need for deeper and more purposeful collaborations. We, therefore, argue that the developing subfield of global health humanities should include purposeful integration of a humanities-based critical disability studies methodology.

Indexed as

Disability StudiesPersons with DisabilitiesBangladeshFemaleGlobal HealthHumanitiesHumansmedical humanitiesphysiotherapistrehabilitation medicine including disabilitywomen's health

Identifiers

PMID35501122
PMCPMC9185814

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.