Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501101›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Motivations for concurrent use of uppers and downers among people who access harm reduction services in British Columbia, Canada: findings from the 2019 Harm Reduction Client Survey.

Abigail Steinberg, Amiti Mehta, Kristi Papamihali, Christine D Lukac, Sara Young, Brittany Graham, Kurt Lock, Mathew Fleury, Jane A Buxton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Amphetamine-Related Emergency Department Visits in Ontario, Canada, 2003-2020.Canadian journal of psychiatry. Revue canadienne de psychiatrie · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Abigail SteinbergFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Amiti MehtaBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kristi PapamihaliBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Christine D LukacFaculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Sara YoungBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Brittany GrahamBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Kurt LockBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Mathew FleuryBritish Columbia Centre for Disease Control, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Jane A BuxtonSchool of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada Jane.Buxton@bccdc.ca.
BC Centre for Disease Control · CAUniversity of British Columbia · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAn increase in crystal methamphetamine (methamphetamine) use during the overdose epidemic is being observed in British Columbia (BC), Canada, and across North America. Concurrent use (ie, using uppers and downers one after the other or together) can increase the risk of fatal and non-fatal opioid overdose.

objectivesWe investigated motivations for concurrent use of uppers and downers, specifically how (eg, in what order) and why people use concurrently, to identify potential interventions to prevent overdose and other harms. SETTING AND

participantsThe 2019 Harm Reduction Client Survey was administered across 22 harm reduction supply distribution sites in BC (n=621). This thematic analysis examined 307 responses by people who affirmed concurrent use to classify order and reasons for using uppers and downers concurrently.

resultsOf the 307 people who responded 'yes' to concurrent use, 179 (58.3%) used downers then uppers, 76 (24.8%) used uppers then downers and 184 (59.9%) mixed uppers and downers together. Four main reasons for concurrent use emerged: self-medication, availability and preference, drug effects/properties, and financial and life situation. People who mixed drugs together predominantly wanted to achieve desired drug effects/properties, such as a specific high or balancing stimulating and sedating effects.

conclusionsThe ongoing rise in overdoses in BC is multifactorial, and the recent parallel increases in methamphetamine use and concurrent use with opioids may contribute. Qualitative interviews may further elucidate reasons for concurrent use. Addressing reasons for concurrent use identified in this study through harm reduction strategies and education may affect the rates of overdose morbidity and mortality.

Indexed as

Drug OverdoseMethamphetamineBritish ColumbiaHarm ReductionHumansMotivationMethamphetaminePUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSubstance misuse

Identifiers

PMID35501101
PMCPMC9062822
OpenAlexW4225273988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.