Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501083›Full record

ReviewBMJ open2022

Assessment of COVID-19 pandemic responses in African countries: thematic synthesis of WHO intra-action review reports.

Ambrose Talisuna, Chinwe Iwu, J Okeibunor, Mary Stephen, Emmanuel Onuche Musa, Belinda Louise Herring, Otim Patrick Cossy Ramadan, Daniel Yota, Miriam Nanyunja, Allan Mpairwe and 17 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

27 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Ambrose TalisunaEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo talisunaa@who.int.ORCID 0000-0001-6436-3415
Chinwe IwuDepartment of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Stellenbosch University, Cape Town, Western Cape, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-0765-7497
J OkeibunorEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Mary StephenEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Emmanuel Onuche MusaEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Belinda Louise HerringEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Otim Patrick Cossy RamadanEmergency Preparedness and reponse Hub, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
Daniel YotaEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Miriam NanyunjaDisease Prevention, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Allan MpairweEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Freddy Mutoka BanzaWHE Programme, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Amadou Bailo DialloEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Roland Kimbi WangoEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Christian MassidiEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Hilary Kagume NjengeEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Martin TraoreEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Antonio OkeEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Boukare BonkoungouEmergency Preparedness and Response, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Landry Ndriko MayiganeCountry Health Emergency Preparedness and IHR, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Ishata Nannie ContehEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.ORCID 0000-0002-9200-189X
Fekadu SenaitEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Stella ChungongEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Benido ImpoumaEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Nsenga NgoyEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Charles Shey WiysongeCochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Tygerberg, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-1273-4779
Zabulon YotiEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
Abdou Salam GueyeEmergency Preparedness and Response Cluster, WHO Regional Office for Africa, Brazzaville, Congo.
World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa · CGSouth African Medical Research Council · ZAUniversity of Nigeria · NGWestern Cape Department of Health · ZA

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesWe conducted a review of intra-action review (IAR) reports of the national response to the COVID-19 pandemic in Africa. We highlight best practices and challenges and offer perspectives for the future.

designA thematic analysis across 10 preparedness and response domains, namely, governance, leadership, and coordination; planning and monitoring; risk communication and community engagement; surveillance, rapid response, and case investigation; infection prevention and control; case management; screening and monitoring at points of entry; national laboratory system; logistics and supply chain management; and maintaining essential health services during the COVID-19 pandemic.

settingAll countries in the WHO African Region were eligible for inclusion in the study. National IAR reports submitted by March 2021 were analysed.

resultsWe retrieved IAR reports from 18 African countries. The COVID-19 pandemic response in African countries has relied on many existing response systems such as laboratory systems, surveillance systems for previous outbreaks of highly infectious diseases and a logistics management information system. These best practices were backed by strong political will. The key challenges included low public confidence in governments, inadequate adherence to infection prevention and control measures, shortages of personal protective equipment, inadequate laboratory capacity, inadequate contact tracing, poor supply chain and logistics management systems, and lack of training of key personnel at national and subnational levels.

conclusionThese findings suggest that African countries' response to the COVID-19 pandemic was prompt and may have contributed to the lower cases and deaths in the region compared with countries in other regions. The IARs demonstrate that many technical areas still require immediate improvement to guide decisions in subsequent waves or future outbreaks.

Indexed as

COVID-19Influenza, HumanAfricaHumansPandemicsWorld Health OrganizationCOVID-19health policyhealth services administration & managementpublic health

Identifiers

PMID35501083
PMCPMC9062458
OpenAlexW4225274800

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.