Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501073›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Sustainability of locally driven centres for those affected by dementia: a protocol for the get real with meeting centres realist evaluation.

Thomas Morton, Shirley B Evans, Dawn Brooker, Tracey Williamson, Geoff Wong, Michela Tinelli, Faith Frost, Jennifer Bray, Nigel Hullah

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Thomas MortonAssociation for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8264-0834
Shirley B EvansAssociation for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK shirley.evans@worc.ac.uk.
Dawn BrookerAssociation for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Tracey WilliamsonAssociation for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Geoff WongNuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, Oxford University, Oxford, UK.
Michela TinelliPSSRU, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8816-4389
Faith FrostAssociation for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Jennifer BrayAssociation for Dementia Studies, University of Worcester, Worcester, UK.
Nigel Hullah3 Nations Working Group for Dementia, Swansea, UK.
University of Worcester · GBLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionImproving support for people with early to moderate dementia to live at home in their communities is a global public health goal. Community adult social care is not robust in many parts of the UK, however, with the pandemic increasing pressure on services for this population. Community-led interventions can play a key role in supporting people postdiagnosis, helping delay decline, but many interventions struggle to sustain beyond 1-2 years. Meeting Centres (MCs) are one such intervention, which many UK community groups find attractive and achievable. However, it is not understood how these communities can ensure they are putting in place strategies that will help them sustain in the longer term, beyond start-up phase. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This realist evaluation aims to understand the factors affecting sustainability of MCs in rural areas and learn lessons from MCs that have sustained beyond 3 years. Data will be collected using mixed methods: interviews and group discussions with stakeholders involved at every level in three case study locations in England and Wales, analysed with Soft Systems modelling; a Discrete Choice Experiment exploring what people across the UK value and are willing to pay for MCs, analysed with regression modelling. All data will be synthesised using a Realist logic of analysis to build a theoretical model of how, why, for whom, in what contexts and to what extent MCs can be successfully implemented for the long term. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: As participants may lack capacity for informed consent, favourable ethical opinion was received from a Health Research Authority research ethics committee. Resulting recommendations will be of interest to stakeholders including those commissioning, planning, running, supporting or attending MCs, as well as policy-makers and healthcare professionals. Knowledge will be shared with emerging MCs to help accelerate scale up of this intervention.

Indexed as

DementiaPublic HealthAdultEnglandHealth PersonnelHumansWalesDementiaOld age psychiatryOrganisational developmentOrganisation of health servicesQUALITATIVE RESEARCHSOCIAL MEDICINE

Identifiers

PMID35501073
PMCPMC9062872
OpenAlexW4225290419

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.