Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35501041›Full record

ReviewSeminars in vascular surgery2022

Current state and future directions of genomic medicine in aortic dissection: A path to prevention and personalized care.

Alana C Cecchi, Madeline Drake, Chrisanne Campos, Jake Howitt, Jonathan Medina, Scott M Damrauer, Sherene Shalhub, Dianna M Milewicz, Aortic Dissection Collaborative

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in vascular surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Alana C CecchiDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: Alana.C.Cecchi@uth.tmc.edu.
Madeline DrakeMcGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.
Chrisanne CamposGenetic Aortic Disorders Association Canada, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.
Jake HowittAortic Dissection Collaborative Advisory Group, Seattle, WA.
Jonathan MedinaDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
Scott M DamrauerDepartment of Surgery and the Cardiovascular Institute, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; Department of Surgery, Corporal Michael Crescenz Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA.
Sherene ShalhubDivision of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA.
Dianna M MilewiczDivision of Medical Genetics, Department of Internal Medicine, McGovern Medical School, University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX.
Aortic Dissection Collaborative

Funding

Genetic Predisposition To Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms/DissectionsR01HL109942 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR HOUSTON · PI MILEWICZ, DIANNA M · 2012 to 2023
$7.5M
Precision Cardio-Metabolic Phenotyping for Genetic Discovery and Risk PredictionIK2CX001780 · VA · PHILADELPHIA VA MEDICAL CENTER · PI DAMRAUER, SCOTT MICHAEL · 2018 to 2023
–
CSRD VA IK2 CX001780NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL109942
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aortic dissection confers high mortality and morbidity rates despite advances in treatment, impacts quality of life, and contributes immense burden to the healthcare system globally. Efforts to prevent aortic dissection through screening and management of modifiable risk factors and early detection of aneurysms should incorporate genomic information, as it is integral to stratifying risk. However, effective integration of genomic-guided risk assessment into clinical practice will require addressing implementation barriers that currently permeate our healthcare systems. The Aortic Dissection Collaborative was established to define aortic dissection research priorities through patient engagement. Using a collaborative patient-centered feedback model, our Genomic Medicine Working Group identified related research priorities that could be investigated by pragmatic interventional studies aimed at aortic dissection prevention, utilization of genomic information to improve patient outcomes, and access to genomic medicine services. Further research is also needed to identify the genomic, lifestyle, and environmental risk factors that contribute to aortic dissection so these data can be incorporated into future comparative effectiveness studies to prevent aortic dissection.

Indexed as

Aortic DissectionGenomic MedicineHumansQuality of LifeRisk AssessmentRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID35501041
PMCPMC9258522

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.