Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35500646›Full record

ArticleThe Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases

Lung function six months after severe COVID-19: Does time, in fact, heal all wounds?

Daniel Cruz Bretas, Arnaldo Santos Leite, Eliane Viana Mancuzo, Tarciane Aline Prata, Bruno Horta Andrade, Jacqueline das Graças Ferreira Oliveira, Aline Priscila Batista, George Luiz Lins Machado-Coelho, Valéria Maria Augusto, Carolina Coimbra Marinho

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Recovery of lung function during the first year after COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Global prevalence of post-COVID-19 condition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective evidence.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Comparison of Long COVID-19 Caused by Different SARS-CoV-2 Strains: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. The impact of mild COVID-19 on medium-term respiratory function.African journal of thoracic and critical care medicine · 2024
    Article
  17. Lung function and quality of life one year after severe COVID-19 in Brazil.Jornal brasileiro de pneumologia : publicacao oficial da Sociedade Brasileira de Pneumologia e Tisilogia · 2024
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daniel Cruz BretasUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Arnaldo Santos LeiteUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Eliane Viana MancuzoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. Electronic address: elianevmancuzo4@gmail.com.
Tarciane Aline PrataUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Bruno Horta AndradeUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Jacqueline das Graças Ferreira OliveiraHospital Eduardo de Menezes - Fundação Hospitalar de Minas Gerais (FHEMIG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Aline Priscila BatistaUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil.
George Luiz Lins Machado-CoelhoUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto (UFOP), Ouro Preto, MG, Brazil.
Valéria Maria AugustoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Carolina Coimbra MarinhoUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.
Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRUniversidade Federal de Ouro Preto · BRFundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 has been associated with persistent symptoms and functional changes, especially in those surviving severe disease.

methodsWe conducted a prospective multicenter study in patients with severe COVID-19 to determine respiratory sequelae. Patients were stratified into two groups: ward admission (WA) and intensive care unit (ICU) admission. In each follow-up visit, the patients where inquired about cough and dyspnea, and performed spirometry, lung volumes, carbon monoxide diffusion capacity (DLCO), 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and respiratory muscle strength (MIP and MEP). Results of pulmonary function tests at 45 days and 6 months after hospital admission were compared using paired analysis.

results211 patients were included, 112 in WA and 99 in ICU. Dyspnea persisted in 64.7% in the WA and 66.7% in the ICU group after 6 months. Lung function measures showed significant improvement between 45 days and 6 months, both in WA and ICU groups in VC, FVC, FEV1, total lung capacity, and 6MW distance measures. The improvement in the proportions of the altered functional parameters was significant in the ICU group for VC (44.2% 45 d; 20.8% 6 m; p = 0,014), FVC (47.6% 45 d; 28% 6 m; p = 0,003), FEV1 (45.1% 45 d; 28% 6 m; p = 0,044), DLCO (33.8% 45 d; 7.7% 6 m; p < 0,0001).

conclusionSix months follow-up of patients with the severe forms of COVID-19 showed significant improvement in the lung function measures compared to 45 days post hospital discharge. The difference was more evident in those requiring ICU admission.

Indexed as

COVID-19DyspneaHumansLungProspective StudiesRespiratory Function TestsCOVID-19Follow-upLung functionPost-COVID condition

Identifiers

PMID35500646
PMCPMC9042802
OpenAlexW4224929243

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.