Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35500005›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

SinGAN-Seg: Synthetic training data generation for medical image segmentation.

Vajira Thambawita, Pegah Salehi, Sajad Amouei Sheshkal, Steven A Hicks, Hugo L Hammer, Sravanthi Parasa, Thomas de Lange, Pål Halvorsen, Michael A Riegler

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Synthetic data in generalizable, learning-based neuroimaging.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Using diffusion models to generate synthetic labeled data for medical image segmentation.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Vajira ThambawitaSimulaMet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-6026-0929
Pegah SalehiSimulaMet, Oslo, Norway.
Sajad Amouei SheshkalSimulaMet, Oslo, Norway.
Steven A HicksSimulaMet, Oslo, Norway.
Hugo L HammerSimulaMet, Oslo, Norway.
Sravanthi ParasaDepartment of Gastroenterology, Swedish Medical Group, Seattle, WA, United States of America.
Thomas de LangeMedical Department, Sahlgrenska University Hospital-Möndal, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0003-3989-7487
Pål HalvorsenSimulaMet, Oslo, Norway.
Michael A RieglerSimulaMet, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3153-2064

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Analyzing medical data to find abnormalities is a time-consuming and costly task, particularly for rare abnormalities, requiring tremendous efforts from medical experts. Therefore, artificial intelligence has become a popular tool for the automatic processing of medical data, acting as a supportive tool for doctors. However, the machine learning models used to build these tools are highly dependent on the data used to train them. Large amounts of data can be difficult to obtain in medicine due to privacy reasons, expensive and time-consuming annotations, and a general lack of data samples for infrequent lesions. In this study, we present a novel synthetic data generation pipeline, called SinGAN-Seg, to produce synthetic medical images with corresponding masks using a single training image. Our method is different from the traditional generative adversarial networks (GANs) because our model needs only a single image and the corresponding ground truth to train. We also show that the synthetic data generation pipeline can be used to produce alternative artificial segmentation datasets with corresponding ground truth masks when real datasets are not allowed to share. The pipeline is evaluated using qualitative and quantitative comparisons between real data and synthetic data to show that the style transfer technique used in our pipeline significantly improves the quality of the generated data and our method is better than other state-of-the-art GANs to prepare synthetic images when the size of training datasets are limited. By training UNet++ using both real data and the synthetic data generated from the SinGAN-Seg pipeline, we show that the models trained on synthetic data have very close performances to those trained on real data when both datasets have a considerable amount of training data. In contrast, we show that synthetic data generated from the SinGAN-Seg pipeline improves the performance of segmentation models when training datasets do not have a considerable amount of data. All experiments were performed using an open dataset and the code is publicly available on GitHub.

Indexed as

Deep LearningImage Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsArtificial IntelligenceNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID35500005
PMCPMC9060378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.