Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35499995›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Nationwide implementation of the non-invasive prenatal test: Evaluation of a blended learning program for counselors.

Linda Martin, Janneke T Gitsels-van der Wal, Caroline J Bax, Mijntje J Pieters, Jacqueline C I Y Reijerink-Verheij, Robert-Jan Galjaard, Lidewij Henneman, Dutch NIPT Consortium

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Negotiating Awareness: Dutch Midwives' Experiences of Noninvasive Prenatal Screening Counseling.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Linda MartinAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-3041-6536
Janneke T Gitsels-van der WalAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Midwifery Science, AVAG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Caroline J BaxAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Dept of Obstetrics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Mijntje J PietersFoundation Prenatal Screening Southeast region of the Netherlands, Maastricht, The Netherlands, on behalf of the Regional Centres for Prenatal Screening, The Netherlands.
Jacqueline C I Y Reijerink-VerheijFoundation Prenatal Screening Southwest region of the Netherlands, Rotterdam, on behalf of the Regional Centres for Prenatal Screening, The Netherlands.
Robert-Jan GaljaardErasmus MC, Dept. of Clinical Genetics, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Lidewij HennemanAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Dept of Clinical Genetics and Amsterdam Reproduction and Development research institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Dutch NIPT Consortium

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study assesses the results of a mandatory blended learning-program for counselors (e.g. midwives, sonographers, obstetricians) guiding national implementation of the Non-Invasive Prenatal Test (NIPT). We assessed counselors' 1) knowledge about prenatal aneuploidy screening, 2) factors associated with their knowledge (e.g. counselors' characteristics, attitudes towards NIPT), and 3) counselors' attitudes regarding the blended learning. A cross-sectional online pretest-posttest implementation survey was sent to all 2,813 Dutch prenatal counselors. Multivariate linear regression analyses were performed to identify associations between counselors' knowledge and e.g. their professional backgrounds, work experience and attitudes towards NIPT. At T0 and T1 1,635 and 913 counselors completed the survey, respectively. Overall results show an increased mean number of correct answered knowledge questions; 23/35 (66%) items at T0 and 28/37 (76%) items at T1. Knowledge gaps on highly specific topics remained. Work experience and secondary care work-setting were positively associated with a higher level of knowledge. Most counselors (74%) showed positive attitudes towards the blended learning program. The mandatory blended learning, along with learning by experience through implementation of NIPT, has facilitated an increase in counselors' knowledge and was well received. New implementations in healthcare may benefit from requiring blended learning for healthcare providers, especially if tailored to professionals' learning goals.

Indexed as

CounselorsAneuploidyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansPregnancyPrenatal DiagnosisSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID35499995
PMCPMC9060360

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.