Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35499764›Full record

ArticleUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2023

[Hand hygiene in the operating room (OR)-(not) an issue?]

Justus Menzel, Annika Kühn, Diana Beck, Bettina Schock, Iris F Chaberny

Open access · hybridAbstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Justus MenzelInstitut für Hygiene, Krankenhaushygiene und Umweltmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 22, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Annika KühnInstitut für Hygiene, Krankenhaushygiene und Umweltmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 22, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Diana BeckInstitut für Hygiene, Krankenhaushygiene und Umweltmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 22, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Bettina SchockInstitut für Hygiene, Krankenhaushygiene und Umweltmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 22, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Iris F ChabernyInstitut für Hygiene, Krankenhaushygiene und Umweltmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig AöR, Liebigstr. 22, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. iris.chaberny@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Institut für Hygiene und Umwelt · DEUniversity Hospital Leipzig · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and objective of the studyIn the knowledge that hand hygiene is a key measure in preventing healthcare-associated infections, the WHO recommends direct observation as the gold standard in order to evaluate compliance. High compliance rates when performing surgical hand disinfection imply a high rate of compliance throughout the operating room (OR). Concrete numbers reflecting hand hygiene within the OR are rare, however, which is why our goal was to systematically observe hand hygiene and create tailor-made training solutions in order to improve it.

methodsA hand hygiene data collection form was used to document compliance observations in the OR in 2017 and 2018. Compliance was monitored in two separate surgical departments. Surgeons and perioperative nurses, as well as anesthesiologists and nurse anesthetists, were observed. In order to test a tailor-made training solution, two separate surgical departments were chosen. To test the effectiveness of the training solution, only one of the two surgical departments received a tailor-made training along with direct feedback from a trained infection control nurse. In the second surgical department, no training intervention took place.

resultsMore than 1500 indications for hand hygiene were observed in the OR between 2017 and 2018. Overall compliance in the intervention group increased from 40% to 75% during the observation period (p < 0.001). Overall compliance in the control group did not increase significantly (48% to 55%; p = 0.069). DISCUSSION: Given that the compliance rate for surgical hand disinfection is so high, the assumption was that the compliance for routine hand hygiene within the OR would be similar. Within the framework of the feedback talks, it became apparent that the employees were unaware that the "5 moments for hand hygiene" also apply within the OR. The employees were also unaware of what exactly the five indications were.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionHand HygieneGuideline AdherenceHand DisinfectionHumansOperating RoomsAnesthesiologistHand hygieneOperating room (OR)SurgeonTailor-made training

Identifiers

PMID35499764
PMCPMC10319668
OpenAlexW4225266743

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.