ReviewCurrent reviews in musculoskeletal medicine2022
A Review of Treatment for Acute and Chronic Pars Fractures in the Lumbar Spine.
Review in Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Modified Technique of Minimally Invasive Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws With U-Rod for Treatment of Lumbar Spondylolysis.Orthopaedic surgery · 2026Article
- Rest Before Physical Therapy Is Not Necessary to Achieve Bony Healing of Lumbar Spondylolysis in Adolescent Athletes.Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine · 2026Article
- Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) combined with pars repair using a U-shaped rod technique for two-level lumbar spondylolysis: case report and technical note.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy with temporary percutaneous pedicle screw fixation as a fusion-sparing approach for giant recurrent L4/5 disc herniation and iatrogenic pars fracture in a young female: a case report.Journal of spine surgery (Hong Kong) · 2026Article
- Pain relief after CT-guided pars injections in lumbar spondylolysis: analysis of MRI findings and CT-contrast distribution.European radiology · 2026Article
- Direct pars repair techniques for lumbar spondylolysis: a comparative literature review.Turkish journal of medical sciences · 2026Review
- Comparative analysis of morphologival parameters in isolated and fused L5 spondylolysis patients on the basis of CT features.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Pars screw fixation for symptomatic spondylolysis: A safe, cost-effective, and motion-preserving solution in resource-limited settings.Brain & spine · 2025Article
- The Classification of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis X-Ray Images Using Convolutional Neural Networks.Journal of imaging informatics in medicine · 2024Article
- Pars Interarticularis Fractures Treated with Minimally Invasive Surgery: A Literature Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Review
- Characteristics of lumbar spondylolysis: L5 versus non-L5.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2024Article
- Main and contralateral side stages of lesion affected bone union in the conservative treatment of adolescent lumbar spondylolysis: a multivariable analysis of 217 patients and 298 lesions in a retrospective cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2023Article
- Diagnostic Utility of Double-Echo Steady-State (DESS) MRI for Fracture and Bone Marrow Edema Detection in Adolescent Lumbar Spondylolysis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewSpondylolysis remains one of the most common causes of lower back pain in the pediatric and adolescent populations and is particularly prevalent in young sporting individuals. Despite this, approaches to diagnostic imaging and both conservative and surgical treatment vary widely among surgeons. The current review investigates recent literature on the etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment of spondylolysis. In particular, it interrogates the use of various advanced imaging modalities (CT, MRI, SPECT) in diagnosis as well as common surgical approaches to the condition. RECENT
findingsRecent data has provided more information on how pars defect laterality, stage, and presence or absence of bone marrow edema impact healing potential. Other studies have highlighted the advantages of using MRI for spondylolysis diagnosis. Other data has provided more clarity on which adults may benefit from direct pars repair, while other studies have compared the various techniques for direct repair of pars defects. While the exact cause of spondylolysis remains unclear, there is growing understanding of the behavioral, genetic, and biomechanical risk factors that predispose individuals to the condition. MRI may be emerging as the advanced imaging modality of choice for diagnosis due to its lack of radiation and comparable sensitivity to other advanced imaging techniques. Conservative treatment remains the first step in management due to excellent outcomes in most patients, with surgical intervention rarely necessary. In patients that do require surgery, direct repair using a pedicle screw-based approach is preferred over spinal fusion and other direct repair techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.