Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35499710›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of colorectal disease2022

Evaluation of combined detection of multigene mutation and SDC2/SFRP2 methylation in stool specimens for colorectal cancer early diagnosis.

Jie Lin, Lijing Zhang, Mengshi Chen, Juan Chen, Yijuan Wu, Tao Wang, Yan Lu, Zhaofen Ba, Xiaowei Cheng, Rongrong Xu and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of colorectal disease, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Diagnostic value of human fecal SDC2 gene in colorectal cancer.American journal of translational research · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jie LinDepartment of Pathology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Lijing ZhangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Mengshi ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Juan ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Yijuan WuDepartment of Pathology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China.
Tao WangJiangsu Microdiag Biomedical Technology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China.
Yan LuJiangsu Microdiag Biomedical Technology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China.
Zhaofen BaJiangsu Microdiag Biomedical Technology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China.
Xiaowei ChengJiangsu Microdiag Biomedical Technology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China.
Rongrong XuJiangsu Microdiag Biomedical Technology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China.
Tian TianJiangsu Microdiag Biomedical Technology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China.
Aijuan SunJiangsu Microdiag Biomedical Technology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China.
Tiantian ZhangJiangsu Microdiag Biomedical Technology Co., LTD, Shanghai, China.
Minghong ChenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, 350001, China. mhchen9035@sohu.com.
Fujian Provincial Hospital · CN

Funding

the Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province, China 2021J01367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeMolecular diagnostics of colorectal cancer (CRC) can be used as an auxiliary approach for patients recommended for colonoscopy, providing more CRC supplemental diagnosis options. This study investigated whether combined detection of KRAS/BRAF/APC mutation and SDC2/SFRP2 methylation can serve as auxiliary diagnostics in clinical management.

methodsKRAS/BRAF/APC mutation and SDC2/SFRP2 methylation in stool samples from healthy donors, patients with CRC, advanced adenoma (AA), non-advanced adenoma (NAA), or other gastroenterological diseases were evaluated using quantitative PCR (qPCR) or methylation-specific quantitative PCR (MSP). Test accuracy was determined by evaluating the tests' sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value (PPV/NPV), or positive/negative likelihood ratio (PLR/NLR).

resultsThe combined fecal KRAS/BRAF/APC mutation and SFRP2/SDC2 methylation detection test achieved a sensitivity of 88.57% with a PPV of 93.64% and a PLR of 7.10 for CRC patients. In comparison, the corresponding parameters for multigene mutation were 46.67%, 92.59%, and 36.26 and 83.81%, 93.94%, and 7.47, for DNA methylation, separately. The sensitivity of the combined test, gene mutation test, and DNA methylation test approach was 75%, 28.26%, and 72.83%. Furthermore, the specificity of this approach in the NAA group was 79.49%. Meanwhile, the overall diagnostic specificity for the combined test in NAA, healthy control, and interference groups was 88.42%. In addition, the sensitivity of the combined detection method increased with the disease stage in CRC patients and elevated along with the lesion size (≥ 1 cm) in AA patients.

conclusionCombined detection of fecal KRAS/BRAF/APC mutation and SFRP2/SDC2 methylation has potential application value for the auxiliary diagnosis of CRC and AA.

Indexed as

AdenomaColorectal NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorDNA MethylationEarly Detection of CancerFecesHumansMembrane ProteinsMutationProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)Secreted Frizzled-Related ProteinsSensitivity and SpecificitySyndecan-2Biomarkers, TumorMembrane ProteinsProto-Oncogene Proteins B-rafProto-Oncogene Proteins p21(ras)SDC2 protein, humanSecreted Frizzled-Related ProteinsSFRP2 protein, humanSyndecan-2Colorectal cancerDiagnosisFecal multigene mutationFecal SDC2/SFRP2 methylationStool DNA

Identifiers

PMID35499710
OpenAlexW4225275253

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.