ArticleHead and neck pathology2022
Variability in Depth of Invasion Measurements in Carcinomas of the Oral Cavity and the Effect on Pathologic Tumor Staging.
Article in Head and neck pathology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depth of invasion (DOI) was added to the staging criteria for carcinoma of the lip and oral cavity in the 8th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual (AJCC8). However, there are multiple practical challenges to obtaining an accurate DOI measurement with limited data regarding interobserver variability in DOI measurement. The aim of this study was to investigate interobserver variability in DOI measurement and its effect on tumor stage. We performed an electronic medical record search for excisions of squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity between January 1, 2010 and December 25, 2017. All slides containing significant tumor were selected for independent blinded DOI measurement by four head and neck pathologists per AJCC8 guidelines. Pathologic stage was assigned in conjunction with reported tumor greatest dimension. Observers recorded the slide used for measurement and potential issues limiting assessment of DOI. Results were compared for reproducibility in DOI and tumor stage using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) analysis. A total of 167 cases of oral squamous cell carcinoma with available slides were included. The ICC score for DOI between observers was 0.91339 (> 0.9 considered excellent). Only 7.2% of cases had uniform DOI amongst observers. Increasing overall tumor size and average DOI correlated with increasing range in DOI amongst observers. Differences in DOI resulted in differences in pathologic tumor staging (pT) for 15% of tumors. Use of different slides for DOI measurements was significantly associated with different pT staging. In contrast, ulceration and exophytic growth did not correlate with higher DOI or pT variability. Despite the excellent ICC score, differences in DOI measurement resulted in variable pT staging for a considerable number of cases. We therefore recommend consensus for DOI in at least some cases in which potential differences in DOI could alter pT stage assignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.