ArticleThe Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology2022
Role of mandibular anatomical structures in sexual dimorphism in Turkish population: a radiomorphometric CBCT study.
Article in The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Digital radiography and GIMP software in mandibular sex estimation: implications for forensic anthropology.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2026Article
- Mandibular Shape Variation, Allometry and Modularity in Adult Mesocephalic Dogs (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
- Sex Determination Using Linear Anthropometric Measurements Relative to the Mandibular Reference Plane on CBCT 3D Images.Journal of imaging · 2025Article
- Discriminant function analysis of maxillary bone measurements for sex estimation in a Colombian population by using cone-beam computed tomography.The Journal of forensic odonto-stomatology · 2025Article
- Forensic Gender Prediction by Using Mandibular Morphometric Indices: A Panoramic Radiograph Study.Cureus · 2024Article
- Sex prediction through machine learning utilizing mandibular condyles, coronoid processes, and sigmoid notches features.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sex determination is one of the primary concerns of forensic science. The cranial bones, pelvis, and mandible have been used for determining the sex of specimens. Because the mandible is robust and sexually dimorphic, studies have evaluated its metric and morphological traits. This study was designed as a retrospective study involving cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images to assess sexual dimorphism of the mandible in the Turkish population. Total sample group consisted of 176 bimaxillary CBCT scans (71 males and 102 females; ages 19-67 years). Sixteen mandibular parameters were measured using two different software programmes. Measurements were recorded in various planes of three-dimensional (3D) reconstructions of the scans. All parameters aside from SIMaCD were found to be statistically significant. The highest diagnostic accuracy rate was associated with IMaF, and the overall accuracy rate of the fourteen parameters was found to be 80%.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35499537PMC10228188What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.