Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35499251›Full record

ReviewEMBO reports2022

Mechanisms of DNA damage-mediated neurotoxicity in neurodegenerative disease.

Gwyneth Welch, Li-Huei Tsai

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EMBO reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 82 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
82citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

82 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Intermittent Fasting Enhances Genome Integrity and Cytoprotective Pathways via (BHB) β-Hydroxybutyrate Signaling and Chromatin Remodeling.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

22 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Gwyneth WelchPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1635-1190
Li-Huei TsaiPicower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1262-0592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neurons are highly susceptible to DNA damage accumulation due to their large energy requirements, elevated transcriptional activity, and long lifespan. While newer research has shown that DNA breaks and mutations may facilitate neuron diversity during development and neuronal function throughout life, a wealth of evidence indicates deficient DNA damage repair underlies many neurological disorders, especially age-associated neurodegenerative diseases. Recently, efforts to clarify the molecular link between DNA damage and neurodegeneration have improved our understanding of how the genomic location of DNA damage and defunct repair proteins impact neuron health. Additionally, work establishing a role for senescence in the aging and diseased brain reveals DNA damage may play a central role in neuroinflammation associated with neurodegenerative disease.

Indexed as

Neurodegenerative DiseasesAgingDNA DamageDNA RepairHumansNeuronsDNA damageDNA damage repairinflammationneurodegenerationneuron

Identifiers

PMID35499251
PMCPMC9171412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.